Help me out of this scam reports please!

[Mr Happy]

Get on topic ye trolls.

He posted proof in one of the threads Mr Happy.

Ok I wasn't aware of that. Thanks for clarifying.

Back to the case. If kushubham9 bought the windows servers and clients he would have bought all good and bad debts, know and unknown, associated with that transaction legally.

However if kushubham9 resold them then he would have resold the bad dept's as well. It's unclear of what exactly kushubham9 sold as we've only heard from one of the parties involved.

By the sounds of it sniffdog had a percentage of the company, ie servers and clients and not just servers. I think in that case if the clients were sold as a company, even without the servers, technically the responsibility is with Rahul of Dhruvahost now.

The problem arises if kushubham9 sold the clients while knowing of potential issues about ownership. If he knowing didn't declare or hid information from Rahul in an attempt to gain extra money then he could be liable.

Someone will have to clarify when kushubham9 found out about sniffdog's involvement.

[ravi_4289]

kushubham9 isnt a scammer , sniffdog shoudnt have paid anything to shubhank he have bought share and he dont know anything about it???
we all know we ask for something as a prrof if we buy anything he never mentioned in the selling thread too that he is partner and suddenly he jumps in and started crying that kid took my candy he should go and catch shubhank and leave kushubham9 alone....

BTW If u need shubhanks cell number i think i have it so go and get him

[nEw_boY]

Well,
HML was a Private firm.
So a New member must be accepted by all current members of the company to enter.
If any one current member deny to have him as member in company, then He cant be.

So he have got his partnership by agreement only with Shubhank.
We can say that the whole thing was done without informing other members...

So officially sniff cant call him self a Partner/Owner if He havent talked to other members too.

In short,
It was an under table deal by Shubhank009.
So As per current talk,
Sniff cant held him as owner of Windows server in Dhruvahosting.

I think Sniff has provided a proof but it was a Paypal payment only without any note.
It may be paid for a service by them.

So need a efficient proof.
Although Current owner of that server are not liable because it wasnt settled out with permission by each & every partner.

[sniffdog]

It seems that Mr. Happy is the only one with a clear mind.

To be honest, I don't understand why Kshubham asks for advice here. We all know that 99% of the people who respond are unqualified to even make an attempt giving a decent reply.

I've tried to explain it many times to different parties, but they all deny responsibility and hiding behind the previous owner's back.

However, I do not accuse KShubham and Rahul that did knew about my share. But, in fact, that doesn't matter. If you buy something, you take all debts (knowingly and unknowingly).

Ravi said: 'he never mentioned in the selling thread too that he is partner'

HML Windows division was never up for sale. It was sold without my knowledge (and acknowledge on KWWH). I had nothing to do with the Linux division so why should I have responded in that thread?

To your further rants, please review Mr. Happy's replies and try to even remotely understand where this matter is about.

'So a New member must be accepted by all current members of the company to enter.'

@new_boy, review your answer. It's pretty stupid. If your rant holds true, then KShubham was never allowed to buy it because he failed to check the involvement of other members.

Kshubham I am willing to settle this once and for all:

My original stake was US$60. As I had free access to the RDP for a whole month (estimated value US$30) I am willing to settle for US$30.

US$15 as your share of the compensation, US$15 as Rahul's share. Fair?

After receiving compensation I will be satisfied and will no longer hold anyone (past, present or future) responsible and consider this case closed.

[Chutad]

Well imo when a new partner is involved in a company then he/she is brought into after the clarification and decision made my the all the owners or the existing partners.

And there's an agreement made either publicly or privately among them either to show and share the ration among the new partners.

But in this case what shubhank did was unfair and irrespective to any one. As this is the case held over Internet so rather than of the documents and agreements there should be a chat log to be provided by sniffdog to prove that he owns the part of the share. As shareholders are publicly listed on the company's shareholders list no matter how and when.

The case here is that sniffdog does hold the rights to get his amount that he invested along with the profit share that was decided by shubham but as the owner dint had consulted the other owners so in that case shubhank isn't held liable for this situation as he was totally unaware of this. Sniffdog could have told everyone after he invested in HML in here so that this situation wouldn't have arrived but suddenly you can't blame a guy who even dint knew about what is going on or what is not.

And as sniff said he has invested in the company so before that he must have had chat logs saved, I am not sure if I missed it out in other threads but you should put that along width the paypal transaction occurred. Cause you can't pay to anyone without even having any conversation.

PS : I failed in my business exams so I may be wrong with those shits that I pimped out from my mouth. Thanks.

[Markant]

we do not care much.

[Chutad]

^^ so why care replying here to increase your post count??

[sniffdog]

Who's 'we'? Do you speak, with all your 18 posts, for the whole of the community?

[nEw_boY]

@new_boy, review your answer. It's pretty stupid. If your rant holds true, then KShubham was never allowed to buy it because he failed to check the involvement of other members.

Well,
As per law you were not a part of it.
There were only three ( or what ever ) members were there.
1>Shubhank
2>Shubham
3>Ravi.
( I dont remember who was thr & who dont, but no one other then this tree was involved... )

You was only associated with Shubhank009.
Not with HMT it self.

You need to provide necessary proofs that you were partner of HMT with acceptance of all current members of HML at that time.

You lost your fuckin money & now you want it from other persons..

[sniffdog]

Please stop posting in this thread ... your rants get crazier by the minute.

HMT .. Host My Twat?