Allow reputation to be given

[Raven Faust]

ageed

[Hyperz]

Reputation system would convert 90% of the KWWH citizens into +rep/ego whores.

[rko]

lol nope
i dont like reputation like

-100

[Chri5]

-1
Idea sucks exels balls.

[Jesse]

its a good idea, just not here. people suck up way too hard to the known people at KWWH. often they will not even read the known persons reply before:

a) just thinking the same way without using their head
b) offering to blow him
c) both a and b

[Ash]

lol,
this idea would be Really abuse badly

An iTrader system would be Better Than this.
If something will be implemented like this,
I will go for an iTrader system

And for the OP's info,
This is a BIG site,people can cr8 many fake accounts and Give themselves +ve reps as many webmaster have replied here.

So,I guess this idea will be a BIG flop like some BIG Flop movies

[4tw]

This has been suggested like a ton load of times before,

the reasons why the KWWHunction staff hasn't implemented this is because;

• All everyone will want is to get their rep counter up, and they'll have links everyone, like, rep me, rep me, (better said by the Hyperz).
• It can be easily abused, people will start registering new accs. and also asking their friends to give them reputation every now and then.

In my honest opinion, reputation needs to be earned from the people, and if you're a well reputed member, you'll be known for what you're.

You don't need really a mod to prove it out.

[greatseeder]

In my honest opinion, reputation needs to be earned from the people, and if you're a well reputed member, you'll be known for what you're.

You don't need really a mod to prove it out.

Yes thats how it works.

[jayfella]

Exactly. People know who has a reputation for what, and bad news travels faster than good. Inevitably, people are gonna get scammed and what not, but thats life. The world hasn't figured out how to stop crime, and sadly, neither has KWWH.

It happens. Its just a sad fact of life.

[wf?9]

We have been discussing the iTrader modification, just because it's taking a while for the final decision doesn't mean we ignored it.

Here is the problem with iTrader, we want the seller/buyer feedback to be genuine, because this can be abused a lot. As we all know there are forums out there dedicated to sell and distribute carded, phished and/or stolen products. What if a group of those people registered here and all vouched for each other?

Example:
A new member wants to buy a domain. He checks the seller's profile for iTrader comments and feedback and finds it all positive, then the member decides to go with the deal and buy the domain, but later (X days, X months...) the domain gets snatched from him by the domain registrar because when they checked the records they found the domain was originally bought with a stolen credit card. (Happened to a friend of mine)

If we implement such feature, that means in a way we (KWWHunction) are held liable, because members are supposed to count on the features we provide, so you can see the dilemma here. Nevertheless we are considering to add that modification in near/far future.

As for the "Thanks" modification, I don't see any real use for it, if you want to thank someone just go ahead and reply to his/her thread. I'd much rather have the database be filled with genuine replies than automated ones.

Also it'll create unnecessary competition, like for some reason the person with most "Thanks" is a better person with fewer.

Currently we are letting users use their judgment when buying/selling instead of counting on stats that can be easily abused or faked. We also moderate and control any outbursts easily and provided many information and advice on how to avoid scammers.

A scammer is easier to spot now, but with iTrader some scammers will get away with it, just for the fact they were able to fake their stats.

I am not rejecting your suggestions, as I said we're seriously considering iTrader, but the priorities here are users and KWWHunction, if there is the slightest chance any or both will be harmed, then the implementation will definitely be delayed.

I also would like to say when you make a suggestion, go with something "you can't live without", by that I mean, suggest a useful feature, think what will happen without and with it, if the difference is none or not so much then the suggestion should be under a "luxury" feature and not a "must".

Dotcom, to be honest I'm sick of your comments about the admins, if you don't like it here, logout and don't come back.

kk thnx