Hosting Provider Rules - Vote for your ideas

[SuicidalMedia]

The only rule I'd agree with is the one about offtopic posts in sales threads. It doesn't matter if they're bad reviews, good reviews or support related. They should go in the "Hosting discussion" forum, even though they're not that needed either, unless they're reviews.

Special section in the Hosting discussion forum for reviews would help to most members, and hosting providers as well. Reviews wouldn't be public until they have been approved by Staff. - and that should protect the member, and the hosting provider.

Badges - > Would give some false respect to so called "employees".
Money - > Isn't necessary.
Trusted Hosting providers section - > Every hosting provider would try to get in, and if he decides to scam, everyone would blame Staff.

If you guys can't pick a good hosting provider, it's not our fault. I'm hosted by a hosting provider from KWWH (KnownSRV.com) for few months already, and I don't have any problems or whatsoever. So the one "there's no good hosting provider on KWWHunction" isn't true either.

[Daniel]

Personally I think the rules we have now is ok. It is easy to avoid fraud if you use natural sense and logic.

[0ccul7]

Vote, see results, take it to staff section, discuss.

Not necessary ALL options have to be implied, hence its a vote.

Check reports, I wanted an option added some time back

[Daniel]

Additional option added.

"Leave it like it is".

[0ccul7]

The options were also suggested by an admin, so don't put it one me that I want a rank and am doing this. A simple Host rank wont make me the king of the world

No more comments from me here regarding this

[Krun!x]

It's fine how it is. New usergroup for a few old, good and trusted hosting providers would be nice though. Providers should have good reviews, no scamming or failed/sold hosts history, good reputation etc

[wonkxags]

This Poll is not going to work like this.
1. instead of check boxes, make it radio buttons
2. a person should not be able to see voting results before casting the vote.

It did influence my decision though!

[DLow]

You left out something unless i missed it, None of the answers should be selected its a forum a free roaming community how ever i do believe people offering hosting should have x amount of post through out our community before being allowed to post in the hosting forums / market place


I say leave it as is and enforce a post count. I also don't believe web host should have a rank it never made any sense to have a trusted host rank here on KWWH because if that host does turn to shit or do something wrong nothing will be done about it don't get me wrong i have been here longer than 95% of you guys and i have seen a lot of changes here on KWWHunction so just chiming in on my 2 cents.


Its simple enforce a post count in order to post in these forums



You may ask your self or others, Why ? what is a required number of post going to do ?

Simple, If you set the number of post ie between 50-100 fly by night guys that just come here to post sales are'nt going to participate unless they are here to run a hear by serious company per say.


Enough with changing stuff around, Just add in a rule

// Edit


And i can guarantee you the only ones voting for there to be a hosting group have a. been told too by there host or b. they are a host and just want profit

[.:Raymond:.]

I say leave it like this. It is perfectly ok as it is. The system th lot at you are voting for will only be good for known hosts here. If a good new host comes around here they will have a lot of hard times getting customers because of the rules.


Just saw dlows post thing. I agree with it 100%

[Mind Freak]

I Agree with Dlow's Post and well atm leave the rules like that only