Intelligent URL Checker | Support 94 Filehosts !

[ifile.it]

@OP save you screen scraping, use API its faster

http://code.google.com/p/ifileit/wiki/CheckFileStatus

ifile.it Reviewed by ifile.it on 15th Nov 2011. Intelligent URL Checker | Support 94 Filehosts ! Why intelligent? if the filehost isnt on our list which is here - http://www.skripterz.info/dev/Link_Checker/?info you can easily add it by checking the link ... Site: http://www.skripterz.info/dev/Link_Checker/ Supported Filehosts Rating: 5

[devNULL]

@OP save you screen scraping, use API its faster

http://code.google.com/p/ifileit/wiki/CheckFileStatus

76 links checked in 6.016 seconds. I think i dont use api

@Mr Happy: for filesonic i will dont use their link chekcer i used own method to bypass their shitty blocking page

also about that 20 links ... i checked 100 links and result was about 5 sec which is good with api was +/- 1-2 sec.

oh also http://www.besthostingforums.com/98282-post7.htm - "It took 3-4 seconds to test 8 links" mine today 76 links checked in 6.016 seconds how the speeds increased

[Robin H]

76 links checked in 6.016 seconds. I think i dont use api

@Mr Happy: for filesonic i will dont use their link chekcer i used own method to bypass their shitty blocking page

also about that 20 links ... i checked 100 links and result was about 5 sec which is good with api was +/- 1-2 sec.

oh also http://www.besthostingforums.com/98282-post7.htm - "It took 3-4 seconds to test 8 links" mine today 76 links checked in 6.016 seconds how the speeds increased

If a filehost offers an API, you use it.
Not just for the speed, but also because they offer an API for a reason.

You're causing a lot of unnecessary load for the filehost. FileSonic bans your IP for a reason. By circumventing it you're just forcing them to tighten their belt even more. And so you are indirectly causing problems for other developers.

Just use the damn API.