Netload vs Filesonic

[Edward]

Hi, I'm thinking of switch from Filesonic to Netload, but first I'd like to know what's your idea about this hoster, what's your experience with Netload ? It provides good speed for free users ? It counts every completed download also for premium users ? Let me know your attitude. Thanks

Edward Reviewed by Edward on 27th Nov 2011. Netload vs Filesonic Hi, I'm thinking of switch from Filesonic to Netload, but first I'd like to know what's your idea about this hoster, what's your experience with Netload ? It provides good speed for free users ? It counts every completed download also for premium users ? Let me know your attitude. Thanks :)<3 Rating: 5

[MaX.]

netload is good if you want to try PPD, but for PPS filesonic rocks

you can also try filepost for PPS

[Edward]

netload is good if you want to try PPD, but for PPS filesonic rocks

you can also try filepost for PPS

I works only with PPD plan, thanks for your advice

[nba517]

netload is good and legit you can try it out
ilepost for pps is a good idea coz they have rebills

[watsayabtcoffee]

I found FSC to be better than Netload. I used to get better downloads with FSC when I put both these links together.

Try it for a week and check the results, see if you are satisfied. If you are not, then revert back to FSC.

But overall, I think, downloaders prefer FSC over Netload.

[PerMaFrOsT]

Netload is the best PPD host for me, the most stable, fast (Downloading/Uploading) and profitable (They count multiple points even if you are premium) The bad thing is you cant upload files larger than 400MB (A big fail if you like to share with 500MB/1GB/2GB links)

[Edward]

I've just see that Netload doesn't have captchas, this is very appreciated by downloaders...for this reason I don't think that the 400mb limit it's a really big problem because without captchas people can download more quietly and they don't care about how many files they have to download....am I wrong ?

[PerMaFrOsT]

They dont have captchas and fast download speed for freebies, the big problem is waiting time.

[Edward]

They dont have captchas and fast download speed for freebies, the big problem is waiting time.

Waiting time....maybe, but if you think that you can queue a lots of file without captchas problem I think that people appreciate that a lot, it's like megaupload : you can queue a lots of file and than do other things without having to enter codes for every single download and it's because of this that people love megaupload...

P.S. Also Filesonic has waiting time....

[PerMaFrOsT]

Waiting time....maybe, but if you think that you can queue a lots of file without captchas problem I think that people appreciate that a lot, it's like megaupload : you can queue a lots of file and than do other things without having to enter codes for every single download and it's because of this that people love megaupload...

P.S. Also Filesonic has waiting time....

I would like to test if they put 60mins waiting time per 100MB/Hour or if size part isnt important, not same:

100MB Download + Waiting time 1h for start the next part
than
400MB Download + Waiting time 4h for start the next part

Anyway as you said, is really good for lazy freebie downloaders because they can put the files in queue during night or day and doing nothing they have the content, my problem is i mainly share big files (+5GB) so this queues are eternal and usually leechers ask for Rapidshare or Megaupload without giving you thanks first for the upload effort