Results 31 to 40 of 46
-
28th Aug 2009, 04:08 AM #31OPBanned
-
28th Aug 2009, 04:11 AM #32Super Member
yeah, warez isn't about removing ownership its about sharing, and LD shares this script..
If I made a program similar to sharpleech then someone went around saying they made it, that would obviously piss me off due to the time and effort what went into the creation of it
So kiss me and smile for me, say that you'll wait for me <'3
-
28th Aug 2009, 04:18 AM #33MemberWebsite's:
rootw.net
-
28th Aug 2009, 04:34 AM #34The Wise OneWebsite's:
twilight.ws ddlrank.comEveryone needs to lay low. LD you have received a warning. JmZ hasn't said anything to offend you in any way and you kinda personally attacked him with assumptions that aren't true.
Can you imagine if all the actors and directors of the movies we downloaded came bitching in here? Or can you imagine all the software developers come and bitch? I don't think so because then this place would suck.
There are people who spend 100x more on creating applications, scripts, movies for everyone, and they all get ripped off by warez.
If you really wanted to take things big you could have easily gotten yourself an LLC company name and start programming under that company name. Then if anyone abuses your TOS you could just sue them. You picked the easy and cheap way.
Also try think of yourself how are you going to find out if someone runs an unencrypted version of DDLCMS on his server? You can't, so no need in making such a post.
The way to unencrypt shouldn't be posted publicly, but this IS a warez webmaster forum.I can always be contacted by sending a tweet @twilightws
-
28th Aug 2009, 04:38 AM #35MemberWebsite's:
rootw.net
-
28th Aug 2009, 05:09 AM #36Respected Developer
I understand your point bro. And I do agree with the fact that we need to have morals. But at the end of the day software is software. How can one share or help share a nulled vBulletin (example) and the next day be against a 'nulled' DDLCMS? That's some bipolar morality right there
. Besides, DDLCMS is clearly not about sharing. Or atleast that's not the main goal of it. Making profit is what its mainly about. Making profit is what MS, Adobe, etc are about... I hope you see where I'm coming from.
I would be the first to complain when some kid rips the credits/linkback off of free software. But DDLCMS isn't free. You just pay with forced ads instead of money.
Now about the SharpLeech statement. I have never asked money for it, I never put anything into that program that would generate profit in one form or another. Hell, there isn't even a donate button in the program. SharpLeech is as free as free gets. All of my programs are. But don't link opensource to free. That's a mistake many make.
The reason the source was never released is because a few weeks after the initial beta some were already adding trojans to it and calling it 'beta 3'. Because of that I decided not to release the source because it doesn't take a lot of smarts to realize that it would do more damage than good. Some would just take the source, attach dodgy shit to the login process and steal users login info (often of forum owners). People who know how to program most likely know how to build a leecher since its quite simple. And I've given parts of the source away when someone needed help with coding a similar program.
And as I said, ripping off credits is something that I'm against. But should someone take the credits of any of my programs you wouldn't see me throwing king size red colored posts around.
Furthermore I did not obfuscate the SharpLeech CIL bytecode. Meaning that it can be decompiled with ease, modified and recompiled (if the coder can program CIL by hand). A few weeks ago narutoroot told me he had decompiled the program but you didn't see me get mental on him. I don't care about what people do with the stuff I contribute to the scene as long as it doesn't harm anyone (trojans etc, not talking about $) because I made my stuff as a contribution with no hidden interests in money or other forms of profit. Don't be quick with assuming stuff because assumptions are just that. If someone removes "made by hyperz" I don't lose anything, therefore I don't care about that.
Hmm, this text is becoming a wee bit big. Anyway like I said, I hope you see where I'm coming from. I have nothing against anyone. I just like to express my point of view which is, I believe, better than following the hurd to make me look cool.
/preach
-
28th Aug 2009, 08:19 AM #37BannedWebsite's:
hd-eroticpictures.comHyperz owned this thread +1
-
28th Aug 2009, 05:20 PM #38MemberWebsite's:
InvestDude.comdamn
hyperz reply = 506 wordsInvestDude.com Learn to make money by investing in hyips (high yield investment programs), affiliate marketing and tons of other method ;)
-
28th Aug 2009, 05:31 PM #39BannedWebsite's:
FusionWarez.info SmokeHost.net Leechers.cowow, +1 Hypers
-
28th Aug 2009, 06:20 PM #40MemberWebsite's:
ddlcms.com xsaimex.com warezgod.com
Let's clear something up right here. Forced ads? Not free?- The user is FREELY ABLE to edit and replace or remove EVERY Sharingzone ad that somes in the script, via the Admin CP (hell, you can put LD ads all over for all I care).
- There is only two things we don't want changed:
- One (1) sponsored search result
- One (1) text linkback to DDLCMS, that's it!
- We already addressed the auto-responder email issue, you can TURN IT OFF in the coming release of the script
The script is free to download and install with FREE tech support, in spite of:
I, and my dev. team, have put in thousands of $$$ and hundreds of hours into making this script as versatile and customizable as possible for all scene webmasters who wish to use it (you will see this a lot more in the coming release, which will be launched with 7 new premium skins).
We've taken action on EVERY SINGLE MOD/REQUEST that came from everyone, and spent our time putting them all to effect in (coming release) the script.
Realistically, you could install the script, be able to fully modify the header, left pane, right pane, footer, LE, instant LE, Partners, Blacklist, Whitelist, VIP sites, auto allow -- you get the picture, and you can remove every ad or change them all to whatever you wish, with the exception of one sponsored search result, and the linkback at the bottom.
For a free script, with free tech support, free installation (mind you, which is fully customizable and skinnable), with only SOME parts of it encrypted -- is that such a crime?
I am to be ok with some n00b goon coming to KWWH and posting how to decrypt my work? And listen to JmZ bashing again? What about respect?
JmZ: lashing out at JmZ was not a good thing to do -- I admit. I sincerely apologize (bug ffs, stop bashing my work in your sly little way).
Frankly, you could decrypt the script and use it and I wouldn't give a rats ass. Posting something like this (first post), and you're crossing the line. Jumping on the bandwagon with it, again -- where is the respect?
All I wanted to point out was if you make a post like this one, you are dissing me. If you diss me, you will be in my bad books. Should I be persecuted for that?
I am a good person, I realize what the scene is about, and I respect everyone -- that's what life is about -- nulled VB or not, decrypted script or not.
Sponsored Links
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
DDLCMS 3.2 help
By FuBu in forum Forum and DDL DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 16th Apr 2011, 02:52 PM -
DDLCMS Someone help?
By lonerunner in forum Forum and DDL DiscussionReplies: 18Last Post: 18th Nov 2009, 01:20 AM -
DDLCMS help please...
By Benzoman in forum Forum and DDL DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 12th Nov 2009, 02:00 PM -
Need help in ddlcms
By DJGaurav in forum Webmaster DiscussionReplies: 4Last Post: 8th Nov 2009, 04:34 AM
themaCreator - create posts from...
Version 3.47 released. Open older version (or...