Results 11 to 20 of 35
-
3rd Mar 2012, 03:47 PM#11
MemberWebsite's:
fuck.yougood idea, if someone have to keep an eye on specific forum it will be easy for staff too.
I AM FROM INDIA SO MY ENGLISH IS FUCKING GOOD ,I WILL TROLL YOU.
-
3rd Mar 2012, 03:47 PM#12
mmm mmm!
I agree with OP.
HATERS GONNA probably bring up some valid points considering I am an ignorant little twat so far up my own ass that i blame my problems on everyone and if you criticize me you're automatically wrong.
-
3rd Mar 2012, 03:56 PM#13
MemberWebsite's:
BuXeeRips.blogspot.com ExpresShare.comI agree with Jesse.
I don't really see the need. Mods are Trusted members to Help out members and not to come in their way of doing something right.
If any Mod does that thing, he/she simply don't deserve to be Mod at all.
No need for this rule imo.
Respect to Original Coders, Encoders and Uploaders
-
3rd Mar 2012, 03:57 PM#14
mmm mmm!
^ You know, shit happens, so why not?
HATERS GONNA probably bring up some valid points considering I am an ignorant little twat so far up my own ass that i blame my problems on everyone and if you criticize me you're automatically wrong.
-
3rd Mar 2012, 04:00 PM#15
BannedWebsite's:
worldwidexs.com.auWell, as far as I see, there can be a scope of lazy modding, as one mod will not have perms to moderate a certain section and he is just going to have to wait and watch while the person who is in charge of that forum is online.
I say keep it as it is, because in my almost 2 years of being a member here, I have (probably never) hardly seen any staff member doing such a thing.
When a staff member is closing a thread or bashing a seller, I always notice that the reason is posted and almost always, that is a reasonable cause to take such a step.
What can be done is, keep the perms of the greens (Yes, they deserve to have the control they have now) the same and make section wise perms for the blues. This way, robert can concentrate on hosting while others can do their own work, in their designated sections.
-
3rd Mar 2012, 04:02 PM#16
MemberWebsite's:
BuXeeRips.blogspot.com ExpresShare.comI think I made my point.
If any such thing happens it should be reported, as Mods are not expected to behave in that way.
That is why they are Moderating (Super Moderating)
But yes, I suppose, simple Mods are assigned particular Forums and they shouldn't be given permissions over a Forum of which, services they offer themselves.
Shouldn't apply to S.Mods.
Respect to Original Coders, Encoders and Uploaders
-
3rd Mar 2012, 04:14 PM#17
Member
Why so serious bro?
Just let it be
Mods are not gods or even bosses of this forum. They are just human beings. If you feel suspicious then report it to the admins. That's it
Oh anyways I would like to point that choosing of mods should be made public by poll.I am the TharkiBaba >_> Oh well thats my websites name -_-
-
3rd Mar 2012, 04:26 PM#18
Respected Member
If anything, it should stay how it is, and have perm delete function removed.
-
3rd Mar 2012, 04:41 PM#19
OPMemberWebsite's:
ihide.info experthide.com hideonthe.net@Jesse
Agreed 100%
-
3rd Mar 2012, 05:14 PM#20
MemberWebsite's:
xxxpornohd.comi agree with OP
why?
because this is what one of the service provider has to say,i have hidden irrelevant details.
left uploading long ago but still making $$ by another way :)
Register To ReplySponsored Links
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Any one moderating the threads?
By rahuldas14 in forum Hosting DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 13th Aug 2011, 06:02 AM -
[Selling] [ME] vBulletin expert Moderating,GFX !
By BlazZe. in forum Completed TransactionsReplies: 7Last Post: 24th Apr 2011, 10:27 AM -
Moderating servise
By LoUaI in forum Community CooperativeReplies: 1Last Post: 16th Aug 2009, 06:54 PM
Staff Online
themaCreator - create posts from...
Version 3.47 released. Open older version (or...