Results 11 to 20 of 26
-
14th Mar 2012, 02:09 PM #11Member
one day china will invade usa
-
14th Mar 2012, 02:10 PM #12Member
This is really disappointing i cant believe our government has sold a British citizen out and handed him over, im really getting tired of the us pushing their weight into other countries forcing their law against everyone else
I vote all websites block us traffic if this is the kind of shit they are doingSignature too big, removed by staff.
-
14th Mar 2012, 02:50 PM #13Website's:
VaporHostn.com
-
14th Mar 2012, 08:57 PM #14MemberWebsite's:
google.comwtf.............shame
My Avatar is 100% Me.
-
14th Mar 2012, 09:50 PM #15MemberWebsite's:
GardinerDesign.info
-
14th Mar 2012, 10:01 PM #16Member
those idiots think they do really own the world.... sombody should give US a kick in the butt and a hard one at that
-
14th Mar 2012, 10:13 PM #17MemberWebsite's:
oneddl.eu nfomation.net linksafe.meI hate to rain on everyone's parade but the case that everyone is relying on so heavily (that apparently legalises linking) is not at all strong. Ask any solicitor or barrister (I have) and they will tell you the same.
While I agree that this is incredibly wrong, it is also time to get the facts straight with regard to linkings legal position in the UK.
-
14th Mar 2012, 10:19 PM #18BannedWebsite's:
trafficstay.comEven though he resides in the uk his website was hosted in the U.S.
Also, "Blocking" all usa traffic would kill tons of sites revenue. Most foreign countries don't convert sales nearly as well, since those people don't have the money and/or just simply don't pay for those services.
-
14th Mar 2012, 10:24 PM #19MemberWebsite's:
oneddl.eu nfomation.net linksafe.meIts nothing to do with where the site was hosting. There are two main arguments here:
1) tvshack used the .net TLD and this gives the US authorities jurisdiction as they have successfully argued.
2) The site was accessible by US citizens and as such, technically means that he has committed a crime in the US. At least, that is how many people, by that I mean the courts, are interpreting it these days.
The only way to avoid reprisals if you run a large site, and especially if you are in one of the countries with a dreaded US extradition treaty, is to make sure you can never be found.
-
14th Mar 2012, 10:30 PM #20Member
"Linking" .. as in "posting" is not illegal in the UK... but when you have a website that you run and administer, allow links to be published, made public and accept payment to infringe copyrighted material, then it is illegal in the UK. This guy did no worse than what the majority of young guys have done that started off in the warez scene. He just was one of those poor innocents that thought he would never get caught! Its also a another case of the UK jumping on the back of the US to help itself in other areas when they really dont give two figs about net piracy! If you were to ask Mr.D.Cameron (UK Prime Minister) what his views on Piracy were.... he would answer... I have only seen POTC 1 and 2... My mate is still downloading part 3 for me!
Sponsored Links
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Wikipedia Founder Protests Extradition of ?Pirating? UK Student
By Bretteo in forum News & Current EventsReplies: 1Last Post: 25th Jun 2012, 06:57 AM -
Who?s Pirating Game of Thrones, And Why?
By ShareShiz in forum News & Current EventsReplies: 10Last Post: 21st May 2012, 09:30 AM -
Justice Department Backs RIAA Against Pirating Student
By gfxshare.net in forum News & Current EventsReplies: 1Last Post: 31st Jan 2012, 06:07 PM -
Is pirating truly affecting a companys sales?
By Daniel in forum Polling PlazaReplies: 10Last Post: 6th Jul 2010, 01:49 PM -
MPAA Worries About Pirating U.S. Soldiers in Iraq
By xfernanx in forum News & Current EventsReplies: 0Last Post: 15th May 2010, 01:30 PM
themaCreator - create posts from...
Version 3.50 released. Open older version (or...