Tidying up the hosting section

[ibby]

Or we could get rid of the hosting / filehost section.. JS

[DLow]

^^

agreed.

I wonder what would become of KWWH with out those two sections loll

[jayfella]

Never mind. I guess the administrators are quite happy that staff recommend not using hosts advertised on KWWHunction. And why shouldnt they, its good advice.

</bothering>.

[Hawk]

jayfella, we do appreciate your feedback and we will introduce additional rules. If you could be a little more patient, we'd appreciate it.

Thanks.

[Suhel]

Or we could get rid of the hosting / filehost section.. JS

Wow, What a pathetic comment. Let's say you own the site and some dude just comes up saying remove the filehost and hosting section, will you do it?
I guess "no" because of the amount of the traffic the site will lose.

[EsotorisK]

KWWH is going to be with rules rules and rules.

We will have a new KWWH Rule book soon with 100 pages of rules in a pdf file.

Why don't people use google for a search? Why dont they go with stable hosts like hostagator?

People will be scammed and will be in trouble with downtimes with new hosts, its common sense that new hosts with dedicated servers will have problems.

I feel like new rules would not make any difference.

And jayfella I like the concern of yours towards KWWHunction.

[jayfella]

thank you hawk. I assumed the topic was overlooked since no staff had replied.

@Eso - the rules only apply to those that want to advertise as a host. Those are the only people it will affect. The aim is not to further confuse anybody, but to provide realistic and honest information in order to stop hosts posting "...established in 2003, we guarantee 99.9% uptime..." - which would of course sound like a very good company, as opposed to the realistic "...established 3 months ago, with 78% uptime".

As i said, this only affects hosting providers. It should not, and does not affect anybody else, such as a potential customer. As far as I can see, it actually helps everybody else. Furthermore, as I indicated, it should and does only serve to allow good companies to flourish, and highlight the defects of a bad company.

[EsotorisK]

Now I am clear with the above statement, lets hope for the best my friend.

[coolboyz2323]

i also agree!!

& Thanks Hawk!