PHOTO-Supreme Court Refuses $675,000 File-Sharing Case

[Ladybbird1]

U.S. Supreme Court Refuses $675,000 File-Sharing Case

Posted: 21 May 2012 Torrentfreak

The case of the RIAA vs. Joel Tenenbaum – aka the case that will not die – took another turn today. Although not an entirely unexpected one.



The Supreme Court has refused to hear his case. While this is not the be-all-and-end-all for the case, it’s another roadblock.

At issue was the matter of excessive damages, specifically the statutory damages that allow for between $750-$150,000 per infringement.

In their brief, Tenenbaum’s lawyer is reported by the Boston Globe as saying “This pernicious interpretation of the Copyright Act transforms every bit of cyberspace into a potentially exploding lawsuit and is sparking the development of a spam-litigation industry”. He is, of course, referring to the many copyright trolls we’ve covered in recent weeks and months.

Regardless, the Supreme Court refused to hear the case, without comment.

Meanwhile the case is not over. The sole issue being referred to the Supreme Court was the constitutionality of the damages, not the merits of the case in any form.

The trial judge had already reduced the damages awarded to $65,000 before having it restored by the 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals.

Judge Nancy Gertner could still reduce the damages again, but in doing so the RIAA and it’s member studios can ask for a retrial. This has happened twice with Jammie Thomas in a similar case. It’s an option Tenenbaum has expressed support for in the past.

Who knows when this case, which started in 2004, will end, and how much more court time will be taken up .

Meanwhile, the real winners are the lawyers for the RIAA (and to a lesser extend the government), racking up fees despite having a poor record of getting any kind of money for artists.

Ladybbird1 Reviewed by Ladybbird1 on 22nd May 2012. PHOTO-Supreme Court Refuses $675,000 File-Sharing Case U.S. Supreme Court Refuses $675,000 File-Sharing Case Posted: 21 May 2012 Torrentfreak The case of the RIAA vs. Joel Tenenbaum – aka the case that will not die – took another turn today. Although not an entirely unexpected one. http://torrentfreak.com/images/tenenbaum.jpg The Supreme Court has refused to hear his case. While this is not the be-all-and-end-all for the case, it’s another roadblock. Rating: 5

[ShareShiz]

Meanwhile, the real winners are the lawyers for the RIAA (and to a lesser extend the government), racking up fees despite having a poor record of getting any kind of money for artists.

so true. i bet its going to be over $ 100 million for lawyer fees after this case is over with...

.. that is if the RIAA wins, which will most likely happen since the RIAA is in bed with almost every lawyer and politician. But, then theres the cases where judges rule an IP address doesnt even ID you, and an IP address doesnt even ID your own state.

Ive followed this case for quite awhile now. have even done a few reports from it for school. wouldnt be surprised if it goes on for another 5+ years