User from GFY tries to take down file hosts. Not with a DMCA, but...

[Harmon]

Shut down his Pay Pal? He is not soliciting any donations what so ever. In fact, quite the contrary. People have been wanting to donate since he started and he refused. The response was so overwhelming that he dicided to take some in because people were forcing it up him.

You are just mad.

[kapitalnie]

Another man from GFY or friend of someone from GFY who started to troll this thread and this board.

[RsFk]

No just certain types of porn. CP is a complete no go. Then there are things they are very wary of. All the rules of the processor are in the TOS. Anyone who has ever signed a contract will understand what this means. I did the ground work when this first blew up and saw the problems legal porn sites have. Processors getting their ability to do business with Visa, pulled out from under them isn't unknown. Go do the research.Not certain on this, many companies might ask if you've had an account pulled and why. They will want to know makes sense.

You really can't get this through your thick skull can you? The hosts are not willingly hosting child porn on their servers. The users that use the file locker are uploading the material, and you can't assume that the material is CP.

"There is a clear precedent on point US v. X-Citement Videoes in which the Supreme Court held that the federal criminal law on child pornography distribution requires scienter (actual knowledge as to the age of the depicted persons) on the part of the defendant."

[bluefrogx]

Knowingly or not, if you bring drugs onto an airplane you can still get busted.

[moogie]

sorry my friend. But this reply makes no sense at all in comparison. LOL?

[CloudShadow]

Knowingly or not, if you bring drugs onto an airplane you can still get busted.

So if you bring drugs to an airplane will you blame the airplane company for the drugs? Will the police go after the company or the person who knowingly/unknowingly brought the drugs?

[pow]

depositfiles still working lol

[filerking]

You really can't get this through your thick skull can you? The hosts are not willingly hosting child porn on their servers. The users that use the file locker are uploading the material, and you can't assume that the material is CP.

"There is a clear precedent on point US v. X-Citement Videoes in which the Supreme Court held that the federal criminal law on child pornography distribution requires scienter (actual knowledge as to the age of the depicted persons) on the part of the defendant."

You really can't get it through your thick head. This is about breaking the rules Paypal apply and has ZERO I will repeat that a few times so you get it.
ZERO ZERO ZERO ZERO
To do with any law or something that will be decided in a court.
Now if Filemates want to go to court that is open for them. However Paypal will drain them of all their money and then wipe the floor with them. Now I cannot be certain as I haven't seen the contract that signed with Paypal. I only saw tho one's I have signed. They are very well written be a team of lawyers, they ban many things including words that can be used, they also ban pornography. RsFK, when was the last time you signed a commercial contract with Paypal to have an account that was clearing $1,000s a day? Or even a month.

Why oh why does everyone keep flogging the police, courts, laws dead horse?

[examan345]

filehosts should just use bitcoin then nobody will have these kind of problems

[JmZ]

Bitcoin? Worst idea ever for a filehost.

These filehosts have no interest in the user, the quality of service or anything; only their income. Now, do you really think regular internet users are going to waste their time purchasing an account on some crappy ad-filled filehost with BITCOINS? Come on man, think logically.