which is best VPS6,MISCIS

[mazzo]

hio guyz !
i want to know which is the best

VPS6.net
XEN-128 - vps
Operating System: CentOS 6.3 (64-bit)
Location: Bucharest, Romania


or

SHARED HOST( from MISCIS.com)
5GB
50GB of Premium Bandwidth

server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 3.40GHz
8GB DDR3 ECC RAM
4x 500GB SATA2 HDD w/ RAID10
1Gbit / 1000Mbit Dedicated Uplink
CloudLinux x64

plz tell me the best!
note: my site is new and ofc my trafiic is not much !
note2: price of both of them is nearly equal

mazzo Reviewed by mazzo on 8th Aug 2012. which is best VPS6,MISCIS hio guyz ! i want to know which is the best VPS6.net XEN-128 - vps Operating System: CentOS 6.3 (64-bit) Location: Bucharest, Romania or Rating: 5

[Storming]

A VPS from VPS6 would be better since you will effectively have somewhat of a dedicated resource allocation rather than sharing a whole server with a few thousand other websites. Since your website is new and if your not a tech savvy person then i'd look at the options for shared hosting, though rather than a VPS.

[Webcs-Peter]

What do you want to know I wonder?

[mazzo]

which is the best ?

[VPS6NET]

Well, a VPS will always be better than shared hosting, that's the purpose of VPS hosting.

[prouciac]

Shared hosting will support more visitors and easily outperform a weak 128MB VPS in most cases.

[Krun!x]

I wouldn't recommend you using anything less than 512MB RAM for hosting a website. Cheap VPS are normally very oversold so you don't get all the resources in most cases(depends on your node neighbors).