Results 11 to 20 of 96
-
6th Jan 2010, 08:34 PM #11OPRespected Developer
Why would you want to 1st create a iso?
You could take the movie and the program would generate images out of the movie file (kinda like putting a movie inside a multi part rar archive)
The crack was a 9.6MB rar file so it was already compressed. If you would put a large text file into a png the png would be a good deal smaller since png is a form of lossless compression.
Depends on the data. If you make a png out of a rar there wont be extra compression. Text would get compression
Nope because that image is invalid plus a server could look at the file and see that the file headers are not those of a png file.
-
6th Jan 2010, 08:36 PM #12MemberWebsite's:
google.co.uk
-
6th Jan 2010, 08:40 PM #13MemberWebsite's:
litewarez.net litewarez.com triniwarez.comI like this idea, if you could create your own algorithm for this it can be used for DATA protection methods!
but you would have to create like a transparent layer of data thats not effecting the actual data of the hidden content and place it over the original for visual purposesJoin Litewarez.net today and become apart of the community.
Unique | Clean | Advanced (All with you in mind)
Downloads | Webmasters
Notifications,Forum,Chat,Community all at Litewarez Webmasters
-
6th Jan 2010, 08:42 PM #14OPRespected Developer
Well, that is why I made this thread, to see if you guys think this might be a handy alternative.
Here's another example, this is c:\windows\explorer.exe (Win7): http://i47.tinypic.com/qnrcr7.png
Size went from 2.73mb to 1.46mb so it does compress if possible.
Edit: this is meant for pure storage lite, not protection
-
6th Jan 2010, 08:44 PM #15MemberWebsite's:
freedom2blog.com wrz4all.comYeah i think that old method of putting rars inside images can be more then handy. Image inside image..lol
el_jentel1 <3 | WGTools.Com | dedicated fan of jayfella
-
6th Jan 2010, 08:44 PM #16MemberWebsite's:
google.co.uk
-
6th Jan 2010, 08:51 PM #17OPRespected Developer
This is not the same 'old' method as the one you are talking about. The old method was:
- Take existing jpg
- Take a file
- jpg data + file data = large jpg file
All that was doing is merging where as this method actually transcodes data. This means the old method was detectable, the new one inst. At least not for non-humans.
-
6th Jan 2010, 08:55 PM #18MemberWebsite's:
freedom2blog.com wrz4all.comI knw this isnt old method. I just said it could be useful to merge both methods. I actually said tht in response to litewarez comment. Wat I meant is we can use your method to compress files & old method to show any random image as outer image. People will see only outer image & it will look even less suspicious.
el_jentel1 <3 | WGTools.Com | dedicated fan of jayfella
-
6th Jan 2010, 09:06 PM #19BannedWebsite's:
hd-eroticpictures.comsounds great
-
6th Jan 2010, 09:06 PM #20Google Corp.
^ imgcentre will become the next rapidshare
Life asked Death: "Why do people love me, but hate you?"
Death responded: "Because you're a beautiful lie and I'm the painful truth."
Sponsored Links
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Random Text & Images In Signatures
By zac2613 in forum phpBBReplies: 0Last Post: 10th Jan 2012, 06:36 AM -
How to recover deleted or lost data, file, photo on Mac with Data Recovery software
By Jack20126 in forum General DiscussionReplies: 0Last Post: 20th Dec 2011, 03:37 AM -
Random.org generated massive data
By BlaZe in forum News & Current EventsReplies: 3Last Post: 8th Jul 2011, 06:50 AM -
Random Funny Images!
By xfernanx in forum General DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 28th Oct 2010, 04:31 AM
themaCreator - create posts from...
Version 3.45 released. Open older version (or...