Do you think Nasa Faked the Moon Landing?

[MrPeanut420]

Another old topic but I totally think USA faked the moon landing.. why?

well top reasons:

Blueprints
NO BLUEPRINTS

he website Xenophilia.com documents a hoax claim that blueprints for the Apollo Lunar Module, Lunar rover, and associated equipment are missing.

Technology
THE SOVIET UNION HAD BETTER TECHNOLOGY AND HAD ADVANCED MORE IN SPACE INVESTIGATION

ask yuri

he became the first human in outer space and the first to orbit the Earth. He received medals from around the world for his pioneering tour in space.

Photographs and films

1. Crosshairs appear to be behind objects.
Overexposure causes white objects to bleed into the black areas on the film.
2. Crosshairs are sometimes misplaced or rotated.
Popular versions of photos are sometimes cropped or rotated for aesthetic impact.
3. The quality of the photographs is implausibly high.
There are many poor quality photographs taken by the Apollo astronauts. NASA chose to publish only the best examples.[83][84]
The Apollo astronauts used high resolution 70mm professional cameras and film.[85]
4. There are no stars in any of the photos. The Apollo 11 astronauts also claimed in a press conference after the event to have not remembered seeing any of the stars.
The sun was shining. Cameras were set for daylight exposure, and could not detect the faint points of light.[86] Even the brightest stars are dim and difficult to see in the daytime on the Moon. Neil Armstrong said that he could not see stars on the daylight side of the Moon with his naked eyes.[87] Edwin Aldrin saw no stars from the Moon [88] Harrison Schmitt saw no stars from the Moon.[89] The astronauts' eyes were adapted to the brightly sunlit landscape around them so that they could not see the relatively faint stars. Camera settings can turn a well-lit background into ink-black when the foreground object is brightly lit, forcing the camera to increase shutter speed in order not to have the foreground light completely wash out the image. A demonstration of this effect is here. The effect is similar to not being able to see stars outside when in a brightly-lit room - the stars only become visible when the light is turned off. The astronauts could see stars with the naked eye only when they were in the shadow of the Moon. All of the landings were in daylight.[90]
5. The color and angle of shadows and light are inconsistent.
Shadows on the Moon are complicated by uneven ground, wide angle lens distortion, light reflected from the Earth, and lunar dust.[91] Shadows also display the properties of vanishing point perspective leading them to converge to a point on the horizon.
This theory was demonstrated to be unsubstantiated on the MythBusters episode "NASA Moon Landing".
6. Identical backgrounds in photos which, according to their captions, were taken miles apart.
Shots were not identical, just similar. Background objects were mountains many miles away. Without an atmosphere to obscure distant objects, it can be difficult to tell the relative distance and scale of lunar features.[92] One specific case is debunked in Who Mourns For Apollo? by Mike Bara.[93]
7. The number of photographs taken is implausibly high. Up to one photo per 50 seconds.[94]
Simplified gear with fixed settings permitted two photographs a second. Many were taken immediately after each other. This calculation was based on a single astronaut on the surface, and does not take into account that there were two persons sharing the workload during the EVA.
8. The photos contain artifacts like the two seemingly matching 'C's on a rock and on the ground.
The "C"-shaped image was from printing imperfections, not in the original film from the camera.[95][96]
9. A resident of Perth, Australia, with the pseudonym "Una Ronald", said she saw a soft drink bottle in the frame.
No such newspaper reports or recordings have been verified. "Una Ronald"'s existence is authenticated by only one source. There are also flaws in the story, i.e. the emphatic statement that she had to "stay up late" is easily discounted by numerous witnesses in Australia who observed the event to occur in the middle of their daytime, since this event was an unusual compulsory viewing for school children in Australia.[97]
10. The book Moon Shot contains an obvious composite photograph of Alan Shepard hitting a golf ball on the Moon with another astronaut.
It was used in lieu of the only existing real images, from the TV monitor, which the editors of the book apparently felt were too grainy to present in a book's picture section. The book publishers did not work for NASA.
11. There appear to be "hot spots" in some photographs that look like a huge spotlight was used at a close distance.
Pits in Moon dust focus and reflect light in a manner similar to minuscule glass spheres used in the coating of street signs, or dew-drops on wet grass. This creates a glow around the photographer's own shadow when it appears in a photograph. (see Heiligenschein)
If the photographer is standing in sunlight while photographing into shade, light reflected off his white spacesuit produces a similar effect to a spotlight.[98]
12. Footprints in the extraordinarily fine lunar dust, with no moisture or atmosphere or strong gravity, are unexpectedly well preserved, in the minds of some observers – as if made in wet sand.
The dust is silicate, and this has a special property in a vacuum of sticking together like that. The astronauts described it as being like "talcum powder or wet sand".[93]
This theory was demonstrated to be unsubstantiated on the MythBusters episode "NASA Moon Landing".

and many other reasons that I'm to lazy to list like the lack of delay in the transition from the moon to earth .,.



the mechanical issues usa faced

and the mysterious consecutive murders of some alleged participants of the conspiracy.


Cropped photo of Buzz Aldrin saluting the flag (note the fingers of Aldrin's right hand can be seen behind his helmet).


Animation of the two photos, showing that though Armstrong's camera moved between exposures, the flag is not waving.


fail they should learn to use the healing tool

Credit Ruben UGNW.net

MrPeanut420 Reviewed by MrPeanut420 on 27th Apr 2010. Do you think Nasa Faked the Moon Landing? Another old topic but I totally think USA faked the moon landing.. why? well top reasons: Blueprints NO BLUEPRINTS Technology THE SOVIET UNION HAD BETTER TECHNOLOGY AND HAD ADVANCED MORE IN SPACE INVESTIGATION ask yuri Rating: 5

[ScopeHosts.Sales]

This is issue included in one of conspiracies

[MrPeanut420]

One of the NASA photos is fake because the shadows of the rocks and lunar lander are not parallel.

busted
The Mythbusters built a small-scale replica of the lunar landing site based on the photograph, using reflective sand similar to that found on the Moon, and a single light to represent the Sun. Next, they took a photo which was exactly the same as the NASA photo, including the differing shadows. The Mythbusters explained that the shadows were not parallel because of the way the light falls on the Moon’s natural topography.

One of the NASA photos is fake because Neil Armstrong can be clearly seen while in the shadow of the lunar lander.

busted
To test this myth, the Mythbusters built a large-scale replica of the landing site, allowing them to take a photo which was nearly identical to the original NASA photo. The Mythbusters explained that Armstrong was visible because of ambient light being reflected off of the Moon’s surface.

A flag cannot flap in a vacuum.

busted
The Build Team placed a replica of the American flag planted on the moon into a vacuum chamber at the Marshall Space Flight Center. They first tested at normal pressure and manipulated the flag. The momentum moved the flag around but the motion quickly dissipated. In vacuum conditions, manipulating the flag caused it to flap vigorously as if it were being blown by a breeze. This demonstrated that a flag could appear to wave in a vacuum, as the Apollo flag did.

A clear footprint cannot be made in vacuum because there is no moisture to hold its shape.

busted
The Build Team first tested whether dry or wet sand made a more distinguishable footprint by stepping in them with an astronaut boot. It was clear that the wet footprint had more detail than the dry footprint. They then placed sand similar in composition to the Moon’s soil in a vacuum chamber and stepped on it with an astronaut boot, which made a clear print. The reason provided for this was that the unique composition of lunar soil allows it to behave differently than terrestrial soil.

The film of the astronauts moonwalking is actually film of the astronauts skipping in front of a high-framerate camera, slowing down the picture and giving the illusion they are on the Moon.

busted
Adam donned a replica NASA spacesuit and mimicked the astronauts’ motions while being filmed by a slow motion camera. They also attached Adam to wires in order to mimic the Moon’s lower gravity. While comparing their new footage with the original footage, the Mythbusters noted an initial similarity, but there were several small discrepancies attributable to filming in Earth’s gravity. In order to film in microgravity, the Mythbusters boarded a Reduced Gravity Aircraft and filmed the exact same movements. Adam noted that the movements were more comfortable and more logical in microgravity, and their footage from the plane looked exactly like the original NASA film. The Mythbusters concluded that the moon landing film is authentic.

The Apollo astronauts left behind special equipment on the Moon like reflectors that scientists can bounce lasers off of.

confirmed
The Mythbusters went to an observatory equipped with a high powered laser. They first fired at the bare lunar surface but did not detect the laser bouncing back. Then they pointed the laser at a reflector left behind by NASA and received a confirmed bounce.

[RT]

I'm really not gonna read all of that, but yeah I think they did land on the moon.

[iMage]

omg they didnt land on the moon then??????? omfg wht am i gonna do? my life is gonna crumble

[Cooper]

I saw that episode.
With mythbusters tests they confirmed that they went to the moon.

[Runik]

I dont know anything about the moon but I wouldn't be surprised if we didn't actually land on it. I know for a fact they cover up a lot of things and create some. I had a conversation with with my Grandma whom worked at Goddard Space Center for over 25 years and she basically told me I didn't want to know the answers to my questions, they were mostly alien related after watching a show on the Discovery channel made me curious. ha. Anyhow I know she wont give me straight answers because she never does but I would like to hear what she thinks about this.

[Ash]

Even I dont think that they actually landed on the moon.
I have read many articles on it coz i space facts etc.

Nasa sucks,ISRO ftw
ISRO found water on the moon

[max13]

Nasa Lied .. Pwnd!!

[Rambo]

Nasa faked it
You can see the american flag waving but there is no air or wind in space
Then from where the hell was that flag waving ??

Nasa Pwnd!!!