Do you think Nasa Faked the Moon Landing?

[Profit]

Because thats what America does. We lie and hide shit.

Profit Reviewed by Profit on 28th Apr 2010. Do you think Nasa Faked the Moon Landing? Another old topic but I totally think USA faked the moon landing.. why? well top reasons: Blueprints NO BLUEPRINTS Technology THE SOVIET UNION HAD BETTER TECHNOLOGY AND HAD ADVANCED MORE IN SPACE INVESTIGATION ask yuri Rating: 5

[SJshah]

1. Crosshairs appear to be behind objects.

2. Crosshairs are sometimes misplaced or rotated..

all edited photo's - they are not the original photos.

3. The quality of the photographs is implausibly high.
There are many poor quality photographs taken by the Apollo astronauts. NASA chose to publish only the best examples.[83][84]
The Apollo astronauts used high resolution 70mm professional cameras and film.[85]

they had the best technology available at the time.

4. There are no stars in any of the photos. The Apollo 11 astronauts also claimed in a press conference after the event to have not remembered seeing any of the stars.

the camera was only focussed on the objects closer to it and not the tiny stars in the background.

6. Identical backgrounds in photos which, according to their captions, were taken miles apart.

they were taken in the same place, duh.

7. The number of photographs taken is implausibly high. Up to one photo per 50 seconds.[94]

they had the best technology available at the time.

8. The photos contain artifacts like the two seemingly matching 'C's on a rock and on the ground.

ohnoes, it looks like a "C".. people also see jesus's face on their morning toast.

9. A resident of Perth, Australia, with the pseudonym "Una Ronald", said she saw a soft drink bottle in the frame.

he claims to see it, doesnt mean he actually saw it. i call bullshit.

10. The book Moon Shot contains an obvious composite photograph of Alan Shepard hitting a golf ball on the Moon with another astronaut.

yea they played golf on the moon..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZLl3XwlAIE

5. The color and angle of shadows and light are inconsistent.
Shadows on the Moon are complicated by uneven ground, wide angle lens distortion, light reflected from the Earth, and lunar dust.[91] Shadows also display the properties of vanishing point perspective leading them to converge to a point on the horizon.

11. There appear to be "hot spots" in some photographs that look like a huge spotlight was used at a close distance.

1. camera lens focussing
2. no atmosphere = sunlight is brighter + light from stars and brighter and more visible
3. their space suits will reflect the sunlight
4. the spacecraft will reflect sunlight
5. the earth will reflect sunlight

12. Footprints in the extraordinarily fine lunar dust, with no moisture or atmosphere or strong gravity, are unexpectedly well preserved, in the minds of some observers – as if made in wet sand.

the moon still has gravity, the dust will stay in place since there are no fluids/forces to change it's shape.

[The Coon]

ohnoes, it looks like a "C".. people also see jesus's face on their morning toast.

Lol, good one

[BlaZe]

Fuck NASA !

[Loget]

Who cares, my aim in life is to be the first human to jizz on the moon.

[CJ]

^ Loget u male

[CM]

SJsash pwned. rock on

Lol, seriously though, who cares?

[MrPeanut420]

lol loget

[Ak47]

I firstly dont give a fuck secondly who gives a fuck, thirdly if anyone does give a fuck then i still dont give a fuck. Honestly.

[JmZ]

Of course they didn't fake it.

Every conspiracy point you make has a valid reason, go google it.
E.g. the waving flag, if you actually bother watching the videos and stop reading crap on the 'net, you'd see that the flag stops waving after being setup. It being folded beforehand is why it was crumpled and it waved for a short time while being 'handled' (if you push something, it will continue to move for a while).