Well imo when a new partner is involved in a company then he/she is brought into after the clarification and decision made my the all the owners or the existing partners.

And there's an agreement made either publicly or privately among them either to show and share the ration among the new partners.

But in this case what shubhank did was unfair and irrespective to any one. As this is the case held over Internet so rather than of the documents and agreements there should be a chat log to be provided by sniffdog to prove that he owns the part of the share. As shareholders are publicly listed on the company's shareholders list no matter how and when.

The case here is that sniffdog does hold the rights to get his amount that he invested along with the profit share that was decided by shubham but as the owner dint had consulted the other owners so in that case shubhank isn't held liable for this situation as he was totally unaware of this. Sniffdog could have told everyone after he invested in HML in here so that this situation wouldn't have arrived but suddenly you can't blame a guy who even dint knew about what is going on or what is not.

And as sniff said he has invested in the company so before that he must have had chat logs saved, I am not sure if I missed it out in other threads but you should put that along width the paypal transaction occurred. Cause you can't pay to anyone without even having any conversation.

PS : I failed in my business exams so I may be wrong with those shits that I pimped out from my mouth. Thanks.