Results 1 to 1 of 1
Threaded View
-
3rd Aug 2010, 10:36 AM #1OPMember
Why Is The RIAA Sending Takedown Notices Over Music Radiohead Gave Away For Free?
One of the "wakeup calls" for the music industry to recognize new business models were coming was the famous Radiohead "name your own price" experiment for the album In Rainbows. Frankly, I still think that particular experiment gets too much attention, as it wasn't well thought out or organized and was mostly done on a whim. I also thought the band made a mistake in ending the download portion even if many people mistakenly claimed that this was an admission that the project was a failure (the band said from the very beginning this was their plan). And, when the numbers came out, it became clear that the experiment was a huge success.
Since then, the band has also come out as very pro-file sharing and anti-RIAA. For example, the band's manager has said that file sharing should be legal and that it is "a great thing for culture and music." In the meantime, Radiohead's Thom Yorke has pointed out that the record labels have been unable to innovate and has predicted the imminent demise of the major labels. Oh, and most importantly for those who claimed the "free" part of their release was a failure, last summer the band officially released a track for free and distributed it via BitTorrent themselves.
So, all of that should make you wonder why the RIAA and the IFPI are issuing DMCA takedown notices for blogs that have hosted In Rainbows. Why indeed? TorrentFreak notes, accurately, that Radiohead did do deals with major labels for distribution of the physical album of In Rainbows, but I was pretty sure they kept the copyrights themselves. Perhaps that's not the case? However, it does seem strange to see songs from In Rainbows included in takedown requests from the RIAA and the IFPI.
We keep hearing from the RIAA and the IFPI that all they want is for consumers to "respect the artists' wishes" when it comes to how their music gets distributed. So, we have to ask, since Radiohead has made it pretty clear they're perfectly happy with their digital copies being distributed this way, why won't the RIAA and IFPI "respects the artists' wishes" on Radiohead's In Rainbows?
Source: TechdirtDeathKnell Reviewed by DeathKnell on . Why Is The RIAA Sending Takedown Notices Over Music Radiohead Gave Away For Free? One of the "wakeup calls" for the music industry to recognize new business models were coming was the famous Radiohead "name your own price" experiment for the album In Rainbows. Frankly, I still think that particular experiment gets too much attention, as it wasn't well thought out or organized and was mostly done on a whim. I also thought the band made a mistake in ending the download portion even if many people mistakenly claimed that this was an admission that the project was a failure Rating: 5
Sponsored Links
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Movie Piracy Halved After Sending Zero Infringement Notices
By ynj in forum News & Current EventsReplies: 0Last Post: 23rd Jul 2012, 11:38 AM -
sending free sms?
By Flower in forum General DiscussionReplies: 5Last Post: 8th Dec 2011, 05:51 AM -
Looking for VPS provider that ignores DMCA/Takedown notices
By teaparty in forum Hosting DiscussionReplies: 30Last Post: 26th Sep 2011, 11:31 AM -
Free fax sending sites
By Anthonis in forum General DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 9th Jul 2011, 08:14 PM -
Sending FREE SMS to Any Mobile Expanded To ALL Countries
By Tigger in forum General DiscussionReplies: 10Last Post: 21st Sep 2010, 05:38 AM
themaCreator - create posts from...
Version 3.45 released. Open older version (or...