FileSonic.com – $17PPS, $35/1000 Downloads – Make Your Life Easier - Go with FS!

[reverse]

Whatever works for your reverse

I just want the option to decide for myself

You know , I had this important upload , it was a documentary of discovery channel which is free to air but only I had it so i pass protect it

It has never been reported since past 6 years (RS link) so i remote uploaded it and pass protect it and then i deleted RS link from my post and I got 31 sales off that file.

So the answer to your question is - Pass protect it and also add your password in description box.

Pass protect won't stop premium sales if your content is worth it.

Regards

[djkelaj]

why they will not stop FSO to FSO,

only 1 explanation
FSO 2 FSO is not remote upload its a kind of link generation
as u detected, otherwise nobody can remote upload terabytes in seconds.
And can you imagine thousands of people try to upload all these games from
otherhosts, filesonic needs millions of $$$$ for more bandwith and servers
+ PETABYTEs of disk spaces they will need and can you tell me, which is fisible ??? disabling it or not.

[cvrle77]

v-4-kt13-d1557-159.webazilla.com - 78.140.176.159
v-4-kp25-d1844-42.webazilla.com - 78.140.171.42

Downloading from those two servers with premium goes with max speed of 130-140Kb/s. Can you please take a look at it?

[iffikhan]

my referral earning is not showing up correctly. i am on pps(10 Fixed) and they are too. Account has been bought but not credited into my account

[reverse]

my referral earning is not showing up correctly. i am on pps(10 Fixed) and they are too. Account has been bought but not credited into my account

Hello iffikhan

Refer earnings are added at 00:05 Server time

Please wait for 3:15 hours

Regards

[Gerner2010]

why they will not stop FSO to FSO, ...

I am not saying they should stop it.
Just disable it on files for users who does not want it.

[djkelaj]

its same friend. cause everybody will disable remote
and people will get files to other host or to VPS
and then will load to filesonic and will cause filesonic lots of bandwith
and server loading. Can you guess how many member filesonic has
and how many terabytes of data are loading to filesonic per hour ???
If disabling is enabled , this load will be more and more and we will say
"file download speed for prem is 1 byte/Sec"

[Gerner2010]

No it isnt.

People like you + 'leechers' would not prevent your files from being leeched just because it was possible.

Otherwise you would want an option like this, right?

Or would you use the option if you had it?
To prevent other people from leeching your leeched files?

That is called 'double standards'

[djkelaj]

read my message above friend,

there is a very good example that disabled fileserve 2 fileserve and you can see
their servers loading, they can not handle the loading of server. Do you want to
filesonic is like fileserve ????

and let us stop this stupid discussion or admin will warn us...

[Gerner2010]

1)
There could be 1,000 other reasons why FileServes servers might be slow.
I am not saying they are in fact slow, but it could be lack of servers, slow script, slow something else.

2)
This is file host discussion, right?
Do not see why it should be off topic to discuss FileSonic in this thread