Yes, well their rates have changed dramatically since the last time I used them. Here is a copypasta from an earlier thread on a different forum in which I praised them:

Right now it is bitshare.com. So far they haven't changed any of their policies what-so-ever. Don't know if they're still fast, but I know when I briefly tried them out about 6-months ago, they were faster than all the other filehosts. They have a copy button, too, which is important to someone like me that deals with files that get DMCA complaints alot (like Stoya and a few camwhores that actively google their name and chase down their files). Also think it took them less than a week from requesting payout for them to payout....



That is just a half a year ago when they were ONLY paying $25 per 1000.....they really were competing with the best of them at that time. The only reason I didn't stick with them is because I had already tried out a few others, first, and because they actually did delete the files, of free users, after a month, whereas the rest of the filehosts I was using didn't.

Anyways, so 6-months later and this is what they have resulted to....



That $.05 you see in the first picture I provided? That's literally from 2 downloads. Now I have 50x's the downloads - that's 100 downloads - and yet they're paying the equivalent of what they would have paid me for 16 downloads back then.....

I suggest if you're going to remain in the filehost game, Bitshare, that you step it up a notch. I you don't, then it looks like I'm going to have to go to extabit for the money or rapidshare for the speed....might-as-well just go to to rapidshare, anyways, with the trifle you are paying with.....