My last 5 minutes at KWWH

[brainst0rm]

Well, this is going to be a long thread.

1. MOD's have to understand their responsibility:
I understand that some trolling, flaming on CB and some funny BANs are tolerable, but if there is someone serious about something, it has to be dealt in the same way. How kiddish can it get then a MOD closing a thread without even knowing and understanding the rules of the forum she's a MOD on and then saying "I did not read the whole thread".

2. Another MOD who was APPARENTLY looking into it, does not even bother to reply to the PM to explain what exactly he thinks.

3. I remember i read that in the last " I do not want to take responsibility for something that some other MOD has done"... but yea, don't you think you could rather have it escalated sir?

Sorry, but I was serious when I asked to open my thread. I had drafted that thread very carefully to abide by the rules and not to harm KWWH or its beliefs in anyway.

Thanks but no thanks.

If you can not have your own MOD's in control, or other MODs not having the volunteer feeling for an issue that was argued on for about 30 minutes on CB, then I am out.

And yes, I am not one of those kids who will come back with another username.

brainst0rm Reviewed by brainst0rm on 20th Oct 2010. My last 5 minutes at KWWH Well, this is going to be a long thread. 1. MOD's have to understand their responsibility: I understand that some trolling, flaming on CB and some funny BANs are tolerable, but if there is someone serious about something, it has to be dealt in the same way. How kiddish can it get then a MOD closing a thread without even knowing and understanding the rules of the forum she's a MOD on and then saying "I did not read the whole thread". 2. Another MOD who was APPARENTLY looking into it, Rating: 5

[iMage]

ok bye .. best of luck in your projects in the future

[Phamous]

[Spooky]

Mr Happy made the comment "make up your own mind mods. you don't have to close a thread just because somebody reported it "

Again, brainst0rm, I point out that my reply was "I dont I read all the thread"

Should you have read the comment properly you would see that there are 2 I's within it.

So, for your education the first 2 words are in response to his comment, the rest of the sentence clarifies that "I read the whole thread". I think that part is totally self explanatory.

I took the decision to close the thread as it was "not beneficial to discuss such topics on KWWH".

A decision I stand by and will do again.

[champ of champs]

Bye mate see u in future

[Phamous]

It's clearly the moderation's fault on this one, the members weren't really discussing tactics of hacking, they were discussing the idea of the site and how it has many flaws. "I read all the thread" (HOLY FUCK, LRN2ENGLISH), that doesn't mean you understood what was happening.

[l0calh0st]

I hate those threads... You just asking for trouble

[shubhank008]

Yea you should have used a (,) comma atleast
The sentence dont even mean what you wanted to say at all

[Loget]

And yes, I am not one of those kids who will come back with another username.

[EsotorisK]

3. I remember i read that in the last " I do not want to take responsibility for something that some other MOD has done"... but yea, don't you think you could rather have it escalated sir?

Don't you think it would be dis-respectful to point on other moderators decision?

And I replied this : Jason I have seen that, we mods do not interfere if some mod has already taken the responsibility of it (thread).