DDL Auto submiter {web} think on this

[jomasaco]

Hi guys.

Im thinking to do an autosubmitter mod to wcddl, replacing the normal submit form.
Can be applied an rule to whitelisted sites, or general.

Now i need your opinion and knowledge abut one question, are good or bad if several sites uses this re-submitting the received downloads, creating an web, received subs will be submitted again.

So Forumwarez1 send(->) to DDL1
DDL1 -> DDL2,DDL3...DDLz
DDL2 ->DDL1,DDL3....DDLy
DDL3 ->DDL1,DDL2...DDLw

My point is same downloads can be (re)submitted several times from different sites.

To server send the data are insignificant.
I guess all ddl's uses some way to refuse doubled url's.

To DDL's, Warezsites can be good less failed subs (send/receive) from someone.

Can this be good or is something to avoid?

jomasaco Reviewed by jomasaco on 18th Jan 2011. DDL Auto submiter {web} think on this Hi guys. Im thinking to do an autosubmitter mod to wcddl, replacing the normal submit form. Can be applied an rule to whitelisted sites, or general. Now i need your opinion and knowledge abut one question, are good or bad if several sites uses this re-submitting the received downloads, creating an web, received subs will be submitted again. So Forumwarez1 send(->) to DDL1 DDL1 -> DDL2,DDL3...DDLz DDL2 ->DDL1,DDL3....DDLy Rating: 5

[Mr Happy]

I think I follow what your saying. Basically when a site receives a submit it saves them but also passes those submit onto other DDL sites.

I really don't understand the point behind all this. Now I have never ran a brand new DDL site but from what I gather is you just get added to autosubmitters like Warezlinkers and Rardownload (as well as other smaller ones eg Mr.WT recently made one).

I think it's pretty easy to get submits if you know what your at so I don't see the point in this. Your just going to end up passing on submits that they already have as everyone submits the same stuff anyway.

I'd avoid it personally.

[Mr Happy]

Though it was bad to reply without leaving an alternative or suggestion of what you could do as your a good coder and seam to have some free time. The idea is sorta similar as sites are sharing info.

This is something I've being looking into a HUGE amount lately and discussed it with other large DDL site owners and even implemented parts very successfully.

Rather than sharing submits why not share information on fake submits. For example lets say warezsite.com submits a fake movie to loads of DDL sites. A huge problem is these are often not noticed and are accepted even loads appear on Katz. First thing I tried doing was creating a script that checked imdb movie release dates to try and highlight potential fakes but with leaked content it's not that great but was a good learning experience.
Anyway you now have the fake submit on loads of sites and it's hard to spot or find them. Let's say that somebody on DDL3.com reports that it's a fake and the admin notices and removes it he could then send the information via a api system of some type to the other DDL sites. DDL1.com and DDL4.com receives the ping or api and checks it's Database to see if it has the same url. It's found so a report is created and next time the admin logs in he sees it and can take action. DDL4.com can then forward the information to DDL1.com and DDL2.com. DDL2.com get's the report but doesn't have it in the Database so ignores it. DDL1.com has already removed it so ignores it too.

This sorta system would basically remove Fake downloads from all DDL sites once it is found on just one site.

Some Options (yes I've considered this a lot):
You can track who is sending you reports and which sites are reliable. You could have lists of sites you chose to receive reports from and sites you want to send reports too. Basically sorta like a social network site having 'Friends'. You don't have to be friends with every single DDL site just 5-6 would probably be enough and you'd get the reports anyway.
You could even build up a trust list. For example if Twilight.ws sends MechoDDL a report we could trust Twilight.ws and have it automatically removed without having to check or approve it.

Another option to the api thing is just have a cron job and they read the reports of a txt file.

Another cool thing is it's a cloud network. The code is on every single site. Their is no control site or database so the system and network never crashes, fails or goes offline.

I've lots of other little ideas, options and things that could be added but this topic is already long and don't wanna confuse you.

I'm telling you this is a great idea and has massive potential as long as you have options to control who you receive from and send the reports too. Otherwise you could have shitty DDL sites trying to harm other warez sites removing their links for their own benefit.



So ya.... code that instead.

[r0ck]

that is a great idea mr happy I would like something like this

[jomasaco]

Let me clarify 2 points, i don't own any site, and am also not so good that you can build a API
I share with you the basis for a network related to trust, security.
But...
There is no unity among ddl's, already as similar idea abut an blacklist i don't now how end that discussion

[Mr Happy]

Let me clarify 2 points, i don't own any site, and am also not so good that you can build a API
I share with you the basis for a network related to trust, security.
But...
There is no unity among ddl's, already as similar idea abut an blacklist i don't now who end that discussion

first I think you under estimate yourself. Your a decent coder.

Second I think you'd be surprised about DDL site owners. This idea could work as if they were poor to share info other sites would ignore them and not send them info.

I know what your refering to. JmZ had an idea for a global blacklist about a year ago. Basically if a warez site was banned then it would be banned on all DDL sites. It was very flawed though as anyone could set up a crappy DDL site and submit well known Warez sites. It was also to more try and prevent sites on blogspot and .co.cc domains etc.

Anyway I'll try and find time to do it so. Was hoping I could get someone to do it as I'm struggling to find time for everything.

I still wouldn't go for your first idea though. Keep looking for other ideas.

[r0ck]

yea jomasaco you are very decent, have used many of your codes