Filesonic 400mb+ Limit For Free Users

[TLK]

Changing it will affect members in PPS plan. Most members buy premium because they want to download single link downloads but if they change it to 1GB or more, it kills the point of buying premium and we will lose $ and also, Filesonic will lose revenue from premium.

They give you 60% PPS and 30$ on PPD. Comeon, be fair. They're doing the best they can for uploaders.

TLK Reviewed by TLK on 23rd Jan 2011. Filesonic 400mb+ Limit For Free Users Hello , Just wanted to know what you think about it & maybe filesonic will act on in. * Personally i think the limit should be moved to atleast 1gb . I have 452mb file parts for Fileserve & i have to rar the files again to 395mb for filesonic :S + Then links aren't interchangeable Also many uploaders are posting single links now & the 400mb limit for filesonic prevents that. Not to mention that you can be banned on many forums for posting 400mb+ links ( especially if you are using Rating: 5

[trli]

switch on Pay per sale or don't use Filesonic

[CloudShadow]

I've been telling hish to increase the limit again and again, but nothing has been done yet. FSC admins need to realize that they are ignoring a major market of their host i.e free user. FS became so popular in such a short period of time because it gave brilliant speeds to free user and gave them importance unlike 99% of other hosts

[Prazsky]

I've been telling hish to increase the limit again and again, but nothing has been done yet. FSC admins need to realize that they are ignoring a major market of their host i.e free user. FS became so popular in such a short period of time because it gave brilliant speeds to free user and gave them importance unlike 99% of other hosts

Exactly, FSO admin needs to realize forcing people to buy premium never works. A free user will convert into a premium user in future only if he is satisfied with your free service and want more benefits.

If I were a free user and got a "Buy premium account to download this 1gb link" message everytime I tried to download something, I would never even bother coz that's annoying as hell.

[broadcast]

I've been telling hish to increase the limit again and again, but nothing has been done yet. FSC admins need to realize that they are ignoring a major market of their host i.e free user. FS became so popular in such a short period of time because it gave brilliant speeds to free user and gave them importance unlike 99% of other hosts

the truth is on the middle.

Overall agree with virus & cloudshadow opinions here that a specific market share is ignored by 400mb limit (and a small increase is needed e.g. 600mb ? ) but there are people who will complain for any new change as this will affect their current UL files specially pps customers.

My final prediction says that nothing will be changed for this specific one issue about raising limit for over 400mb.

We have to wait what FSn staff will decide to do finally for the free size limit.

[House_maniac]

yes some hosts don't understand that it is free users who make them popular look at megaupload and fileserve they got awesome speed for free users,also filesonic should lift the limit for users do they think it still the rapidshare time when you had to split on 200mb part

[viruz99]

Filesonic only cares about the $$$ not users satisfaction , when the other filehost i.e : Fileserve becomes #1 . Filesonic will go down

[DANG3ROUS]

Filesonic only cares about the $$$ not users satisfaction , when the other filehost i.e : Fileserve becomes #1 . Filesonic will go down

+ 1. Really they want to see this thread..

[viruz99]

Only those on PPS would say Keep the 400mb limit

On warez-bb poll - 100% for the change
On KWWHunction poll - 78.95 % for the change
On DP Forums poll - 44.44 % for the change

[ILHFFS]

filesonic never ever do this. Because if they do this then they will not sell more premium I know lots of users only post 400+ MB link so that user must buy premium and user as well as filehost both getting premium sale.