Results 1 to 10 of 12
Hybrid View
-
6th Feb 2011, 12:53 PM #1Member
That's the biggest problem here, everyone thinks it's their right to offer their services here. Rule should be something like this: They would have to show proof to staff that they have indeed "servers" when they write in their thread: "Our servers our secured", even though the word they're looking for is "Our VPS is secured". KWWHunction hosting providers really lie too much. They get a VPS and start selling hosting. And when you tell them that they aren't web hosters, and that they're just resellers. They say: "Everyone started with a VPS". Well, Sherlock, not really. Some people invest in their business, to become a good web hosting provider you need to invest. You need to offer something that other providers don't.
SuicidalMedia Reviewed by SuicidalMedia on . Should There Be a Rule Against hosting? I have seen 0Day Webhosters Selling Yearly Packages? And people Like Fool Buying. So i suggest to add a clause that highest u can sell Packages if your site is up for that much amount of time for Quarterly Your Webhost Shud be old for atleast 3 months and so on. Ignore it on Monthly though. Rating: 5
Sponsored Links
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
New Hosting and or Services Rule ?
By DLow in forum Feedback and SuggestionsReplies: 3Last Post: 1st Jan 2012, 02:36 AM -
New rule about hosting ...
By alegromat in forum Feedback and SuggestionsReplies: 6Last Post: 24th Aug 2011, 03:32 PM -
New rep rule...
By thecompgame in forum General DiscussionReplies: 2Last Post: 27th Jul 2011, 05:51 AM -
Is DMCA Rule applicable for Offshore hosting??
By warezboy in forum General DiscussionReplies: 25Last Post: 29th Jul 2010, 10:49 PM -
New Rule?
By kenshin in forum General DiscussionReplies: 8Last Post: 30th Dec 2009, 06:06 AM
themaCreator - create posts from...
Version 3.50 released. Open older version (or...