[POLL] Filesonic 2 Filesonic Remote Should Back Or Not?

[kiddo]

I voted YES. It would be nice if its back !

kiddo Reviewed by kiddo on 9th Apr 2011. [POLL] Filesonic 2 Filesonic Remote Should Back Or Not? Hi, as we all dropping our comments in filesonic official article about fsc to fsc ru should back or not please give your suggestion here by poll that would be easy to determine for every one and for filesonic. Rating: 5

[Raven]

No , thanks.

[rsuploader]

Never. I hope they will learn their lesson. They are warez dependent. Warez BB just showed how powerful they are in the warez scene.

[Prazsky]

I voted NO. It's only useful for spammers.

There is a reason why every other file host has already disabled the internal remote. I hope FSc sees the bigger picture and decides to follow their lead.

[adrunkenmess]

I voted NO. It's only useful for spammers.

There is a reason why every other file host has already disabled the internal remote. I hope FSc sees the bigger picture and decides to follow their lead.

I'm sure most have used FSC to FSC but I don't think we're dependent on it as uploaders. FSC to FSC is just faster than going FSC to RL to FSC for us, nothing more.

I will say that I noticed a lot less FSC links being posted on rlsbb and rlslog the past two days since the fsc to fsc has been negated. It's a good thing in my opinion, you would get post after post on there of people using someone else's upload and posting it like they are original poster.

[mars0512]

i voted NO

[chromer19]

Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

[Uchiha-Madara]

yes yes yesy yes yes yes yes

[yoyoyora]

I vote Yes . I am spammer

[problem_dude]

I voted yes!!!!!!!! Bring it back!!!!!