Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
11th May 2011, 11:07 PM #1OPmmm mmm!
How WikiLeaks Gags Its Own Staff
"The New Statesman has just revealed the extent of the legal eccentricity and paranoia that exists at the WikiLeaks organization. The magazine published a leaked copy of the draconian and extraordinary legal gag which WikiLeaks imposes on its own staff. Clause 5 of the Confidentiality Agreement (PDF) imposes a penalty of ?12,000,000 (approximately $20,000,000) on anyone who breaches this legal gag. Sounds like they don't trust their own staff."
Daniel Reviewed by Daniel on . How WikiLeaks Gags Its Own Staff "The New Statesman has just revealed the extent of the legal eccentricity and paranoia that exists at the WikiLeaks organization. The magazine published a leaked copy of the draconian and extraordinary legal gag which WikiLeaks imposes on its own staff. Clause 5 of the Confidentiality Agreement (PDF) imposes a penalty of ?12,000,000 (approximately $20,000,000) on anyone who breaches this legal gag. Sounds like they don't trust their own staff." Rating: 5HATERS GONNA probably bring up some valid points considering I am an ignorant little twat so far up my own ass that i blame my problems on everyone and if you criticize me you're automatically wrong.
-
12th May 2011, 04:53 PM #2MemberWebsite's:
StudentSharez.com?12,000,000
They are smart
Offshore-host.blogspot.com - List of DMCA flexible webhosts.
StudentSharez.com - Medical ebooks and lectures.
-
12th May 2011, 08:43 PM #3OPmmm mmm!
I wonder how they like their documents being leaked. It would make my year if they sued over this.
HATERS GONNA probably bring up some valid points considering I am an ignorant little twat so far up my own ass that i blame my problems on everyone and if you criticize me you're automatically wrong.
-
12th May 2011, 09:08 PM #4BannedWebsite's:
CuraShare.Net CuraShare.Me CuraShare.InfoI believe this is for the privacy of the leakers, and the site's security. If one may leak such sensitive information they may put potential leakers in grave danger...
-
12th May 2011, 10:20 PM #5The Realest Nigga
+1 CuraHack, exactly what I was thinking. No one would leak from inside wikileaks if they are liable for 12 million for damages caused.
Sponsored Links
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
The Beginning of the End for Wikileaks?
By upnorth in forum News & Current EventsReplies: 9Last Post: 15th Nov 2011, 01:03 PM -
WikiLeaks protest
By DXS in forum General DiscussionReplies: 4Last Post: 21st Jan 2011, 01:53 AM -
To0 WikiLeaks
By Raven Faust in forum General DiscussionReplies: 20Last Post: 29th Dec 2010, 05:13 PM -
Become a Wikileaks Mirror!
By CuraHack in forum News & Current EventsReplies: 12Last Post: 6th Dec 2010, 02:37 AM -
WikiLeaks Should...
By Daniel in forum Polling PlazaReplies: 45Last Post: 4th Dec 2010, 11:53 PM
themaManager - edit and manage...
Version 4.22 released. Open older version (or...