i get better stats with lighttpd then with nginx on my site/server. but maybe that this is because i have most PHP and not total static (cached html) pages.

+ less errors, but nginx will fix the errors too in the future i think, it's still new. i'm mean new compared to apache and lighttpd. but it's not that new in days/years. :>
sloddl Reviewed by sloddl on . Apache vs nginx vs lighttpd (And Cherokee!) This thread was inspired by Lifetalk in the CB, sorry but I didn't set up Cherokee as I couldn't be bothered reading up as to how. But I'll include it next time! If you want to run some tests on your own machine that'd be cool for comparison (especially with hardware and stuff). Server specs: CPU: Xeon X3430 @ 2.40GHz RAM: 8GB HDD: 2x 1000GB in SW RAID 1. BW: 100Mbps (Not that it matters...). Server is CentOS 64bit, completely fresh format and the latest available kernel. Nothing has Rating: 5