Activity Stream
48,167 MEMBERS
6861 ONLINE
besthostingforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter besthostingforums On Twitter besthostingforums On Facebook besthostingforums On facebook groups

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20
  1.     
    #11
    Banned
    Quote Originally Posted by intensecool View Post

    171MB/s

    Thats not possible..yet
    Well even if you provide 10GBit Servers to your clients,there is no filehost atm that is capable of provideing 171MB/s on a single stream upload.And NO hdd yet is capable of delivering 171MB/S

    !!!please dont post misleading images...
    i have seen 700MB/s on my 2mbit home connection in Filezilla...therefore the conclusion is that they are not even burst speeds...They are not true stats.

  2.   Sponsored Links

  3.     
    #12
    Banned
    Website's:
    uniquewarez.com
    I am selling RDP here for over 6 months,
    Do you think i am going to make a fool out of myself by showing WRONG IMAGES.
    behave dude.

    And DUDE, if you are SO WORRIED, why not check this VIDEO, which i just did ESPECIALLY for you.

    CLICK HERE FOR VIDEO PROOF.

  4.     
    #13
    Banned
    IDC for how long you have been selling a protocol,but 171MB/S is seriously misleading stuff

    171.1MB/S=1.34GBit/S = NOT POSSIBLE = LOL @ INTENSECOOL!


    Moreover the file = 735913984bytes = 718666 kbytes = 701mbytes

    The elapsed time=4 sec, remaining time =4 sec...

    Therefor total time taken=8sec

    Speed=701mbyte divided by 8sec

    =87mbyte/s AND NOT 171MBYTE/S = FAIL!



    SO NOW WHO IS LIEING?

    DO your math before posting crap

  5.     
    #14
    Banned
    Website's:
    uniquewarez.com
    Dude, if you can not WATCH A VIDEO , i can't help.
    And if you have seen the video and still say i am lying, i don't care.

    Whatever you choose for youself.

  6.     
    #15
    Banned
    i just proved you wrong on image YOU posted.
    so everyone knows who`s lieing

  7.     
    #16
    Member
    Its not possible , max speeds for 100mbps is 12.5mb/s , for 1gbps lines is 125mb/s and 10 gbps line is 1250 /mbs and I doubt you have a 10 gbps line .

  8.     
    #17
    Member
    why u guys taking so much just use a demo ac and check speed if everything working fine then buy if not then dnt buy simple
    these days hosts just capping speed if u will Buy 10Gbps Line and Upload In Mu(example) u cant get more then 500Kbps

  9.     
    #18
    ψ(`∇?)ψ
    There is nothing to check, math is simple, no matter what filezilla shows in speeds,

    1900MB / 21 second = 90.4MB/s <--which is still fast as hell
    There is no 171, or 400MB/s

    There is no wrong or faked images here, it's just filezilla issue.

    If you saw those numbers, it has nothing to do with actual speed, it is just a way how filezilla refresh speeds, where you, in one moment get 60MB/s and in next 171.

    This is because time of refreshing is =/= 1 sec sharp, it varies from 0.5 to 1.5 sec
    So, simply said you get for example 60MB/0.5 sec and in next 171/1.7 sec

    This is caused by caching data from HDD into buffer, where, every time data is read from HDD, speed drops, and when it burst from buffer, speed jumps, but only because there is lag in speed measuring.

    Also, no regular SATA disk can read more than 100-110MB/s
    Only expensive SAS or SSD disks can go 2X-3X times of that.

    Well, people learn as long as they are interested in learning.

    Btw, same thing is happening with zooms uploader.

    While it shows 130-180MB/s, which is impossible on 1gbit lane (even with SAS disks I have), real speed doesn't go that much, and real speed is shown in Task Manager / Networking / Bytes Sent Per Interval.

    ONLY this shows you real speeds, none of other programs can show you more realistic speeds from Networking, not DUMeter, not some networking tools, because only there refresh rate is 1 sec +- 0.1 S


  10.     
    #19
    Banned
    Quote Originally Posted by cvrle77 View Post
    There is nothing to check, math is simple, no matter what filezilla shows in speeds,

    1900MB / 21 second = 90.4MB/s <--which is still fast as hell
    There is no 171, or 400MB/s

    There is no wrong or faked images here, it's just filezilla issue.

    If you saw those numbers, it has nothing to do with actual speed, it is just a way how filezilla refresh speeds, where you, in one moment get 60MB/s and in next 171.

    This is because time of refreshing is =/= 1 sec sharp, it varies from 0.5 to 1.5 sec
    So, simply said you get for example 60MB/0.5 sec and in next 171/1.7 sec

    This is caused by caching data from HDD into buffer, where, every time data is read from HDD, speed drops, and when it burst from buffer, speed jumps, but only because there is lag in speed measuring.

    Also, no regular SATA disk can read more than 100-110MB/s
    Only expensive SAS or SSD disks can go 2X-3X times of that.

    Well, people learn as long as they are interested in learning.

    Btw, same thing is happening with zooms uploader.

    While it shows 130-180MB/s, which is impossible on 1gbit lane (even with SAS disks I have), real speed doesn't go that much, and real speed is shown in Task Manager / Networking / Bytes Sent Per Interval.
    i couldnt have told it better mate

  11.     
    #20
    Banned
    Website's:
    rapidleechhosting.net ponofilms.net wupload.ws
    upload speed to fileserve


    upload speed to filesonic


    i can also provide u a demo for upload test

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 23rd Aug 2012, 04:40 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 25th Jul 2012, 06:42 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 4th Jul 2012, 07:08 PM
  4. OnLive Desktop Plus launches; super-fast IE9 for iPad
    By ShareShiz in forum News & Current Events
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23rd Feb 2012, 02:44 AM
  5. Needs Rapidleech with super fast speed
    By -saMmy- in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 3rd Nov 2011, 02:49 PM

Tags for this Thread

BE SOCIAL