Results 11 to 13 of 13
Threaded View
-
24th May 2011, 08:41 PM #1OPMemberWebsite's:
eiswebhosting.com mastddl.com[Howto] Optimize Your Site With GZIP Compression and cache
Part 1
Compression is a simple, effective way to save bandwidth and speed up your site.
Before we start I should explain what content encoding is. When you request a file like myseite.com/index.html, your browser talks to a web server. The conversation goes a little like this:
So what's the problem?
Well, the system works, but it's not that efficient. 100KB is a lot of text, and frankly, HTML is redundant. Every <html>, <table> and <div> tag has a closing tag that's almost the same. Words are repeated throughout the document. Any way you slice it, HTML (and its beefy cousin, XML) is not lean.
And what's the plan when a file's too big? Zip it!
If we could send a .zip file to the browser (index.html.zip) instead of plain old index.html, we'd save on bandwidth and download time. The browser could download the zipped file, extract it, and then show it to user, who's in a good mood because the page loaded quickly. The browser-server conversation might look like this:
The tricky part of this exchange is the browser and server knowing it's ok to send a zipped file over. The agreement has two parts
- The browser sends a header telling the server it accepts compressed content (gzip and deflate are two compression schemes): Accept-Encoding: gzip, deflate
- The server sends a response if the content is actually compressed: Content-Encoding: gzip
If the server doesn't send the content-encoding response header, it means the file is not compressed (the default on many servers). The "Accept-encoding" header is just a request by the browser, not a demand. If the server doesn't want to send back compressed content, the browser has to make do with the heavy regular version.
Setting up the server
The "good news" is that we can't control the browser. It either sends the Accept-encoding: gzip, deflate header or it doesn't.
Our job is to configure the server so it returns zipped content if the browser can handle it, saving bandwidth for everyone (and giving us a happy user).
For IIS, enable compression in the settings.
In Apache,enabling output compression is fairly straightforward. Add the following to your .htaccess file:
Code:# compress text, html, javascript, css, xml: AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/plain AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/html AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/xml AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE text/css AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/xml AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/xhtml+xml AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/rss+xml AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/javascript AddOutputFilterByType DEFLATE application/x-javascript # Or, compress certain file types by extension: <Files *.html> SetOutputFilter DEFLATE </Files>
- mod_deflate is easier to set up and is standard.
- mod_gzip seems more powerful: you can pre-compress content.
Deflate is quick and works, so I use it; use mod_gzip if that floats your boat. In either case, Apache checks if the browser sent the "Accept-encoding" header and returns the compressed or regular version of the file. However, some older browsers may have trouble (more below) and there are special directives you can add to correct this.
If you can't change your .htaccess file, you can use PHP to return compressed content. Give your HTML file a .php extension and add this code to the top:
In PHP:
PHP Code:<?php if (substr_count($_SERVER['HTTP_ACCEPT_ENCODING'], 'gzip')) ob_start("ob_gzhandler"); else ob_start(); ?>
Verify Your Compression
Once you've configured your server, check to make sure you're actually serving up compressed content.
- Online: Use the online gzip test to check whether your page is compressed.
- In your browser: Use Web Developer Toolbar > Information > View Document Size (like I did for Yahoo, above) to see whether the page is compressed.
- View the headers: Use Live HTTP Headers to examine the response. Look for a line that says "Content-encoding: gzip".
Be prepared to marvel at the results. The MastDDL shrunk from 90k to 10k, a 88% reduction in size.
Caveats
As exciting as it may appear, HTTP Compression isn't all fun and games. Here's what to watch out for:
- Older browsers: Yes, some browsers still may have trouble with compressed content (they say they can accept it, but really they can't). If your site absolutely must work with Netscape 1.0 on Windows 95, you may not want to use HTTP Compression. Apache mod_deflate has some rules to avoid compression for older browsers.
- Already-compressed content: Most images, music and videos are already compressed. Don't waste time compressing them again. In fact, you probably only need to compress the "big 3" (HTML, CSS and Javascript).
- CPU-load: Compressing content on-the-fly uses CPU time and saves bandwidth. Usually this is a great tradeoff given the speed of compression. There are ways to pre-compress static content and send over the compressed versions. This requires more configuration; even if it's not possible, compressing output may still be a net win. Using CPU cycles for a faster user experience is well worth it, given the short attention spans on the web.
Enabling compression is one of the fastest ways to improve your site's performance. Go forth, set it up, and let your users enjoy the benefits.
Part 2
next post
Source: betterexplained
EW-Team Reviewed by EW-Team on . [Howto] Optimize Your Site With GZIP Compression and cache Part 1 Compression is a simple, effective way to save bandwidth and speed up your site. Before we start I should explain what content encoding is. When you request a file like myseite.com/index.html, your browser talks to a web server. The conversation goes a little like this: http://i2.mastiimage.com/view/EGeFbwEC/HTTP_request.png So what's the problem? Rating: 5
Host Images FREE no delete
Sponsored Links
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
optimize my site
By kkrajdurai in forum Technical Help Desk SupportReplies: 12Last Post: 12th Jul 2012, 09:08 PM -
wp super cache VS w3 total cache
By kokosko in forum Webmaster DiscussionReplies: 1Last Post: 21st Dec 2011, 07:44 PM -
W3 cache plugin - breaks my site.
By BeitarJerusalem in forum WordpressReplies: 12Last Post: 12th Dec 2011, 01:23 PM -
How to speed up your site with GZIP
By cgworld in forum Tutorials and GuidesReplies: 20Last Post: 8th Mar 2011, 05:38 PM -
[Wordpress] WP Super Cache or W3 Total Cache ?
By Rocke in forum Polling PlazaReplies: 13Last Post: 13th Dec 2010, 06:00 PM
themaCreator - create posts from...
Version 3.47 released. Open older version (or...