DDLCMS question?

[JmZ]

You're missing something little dragon, a very important plural, "exploits".

Your devs fixed an exploit. And you wonder why I continued trying to get you to understand that more exist.

Just take in what im saying and use it to your advantage. I'm telling you your script contains exploits, so go tell your devs to find them instead of trying to provoke me and argue with me. I'm giving you a genuine tip, take it.

[ChosenOne]

You misunderstood JmZ. He said your script is still vulnerable. Now, it's your turn to find and fix them.

[DEViANCE]

They way its said is like "i know but i ain't telling you as i want your script to fail"..

Whats your comeback to the experienced thing?? I am to crap at php to work out wcddl?? I think not.I just don't have the time, would take months to get it to the standard i want, and i want it to go even further than that also.

There is only one thing about ddl cms that really bugs me which is the massive amount of missing quotes in html and non valid html, but i suspect wcddl isn't valid either. I have not checked though.

[ChosenOne]

Little_Dragon is professional coder, he know them mate. Let him do the work.


WCDDL is for professionals, DDLCMS is for newbies.


Direct Download Links Content Menagment Script wtf?
there's no point of discussion

[DEViANCE]

Its quite clearly stated many times throughout this thread that its not little dragon alone working on the script but a team and if you know an exploit your being a lil bitch keeping it to yourself, tell him/them the exploit/s or gtfo.

And still what is your comeback to my script list?? Experience? Check the submission dates on those scripts..... two years ago i think.... or maybe more for first versions of mobile chat dating back to 2004! It totally invalidates your experience theory.....

PS: since version 2.x.x mobile chat has NEVER been hacked. I personally made the owner, admin, mod system.

[Little Dragon]

Thanks DEViANCE for pointing out an important fact about his attitude towards this whole thing.

You misunderstood JmZ. He said your script is still vulnerable.

How the hell would JmZ know if my script "still has exploits" when he is still scrutinizing the same, original, beta release -- and doesn't even know the location of the new test sites?


People, I have a new release, and in this new release, all reported problems, and then some, have been addressed and fixed.

You're missing something little dragon, a very important plural, "exploits".

Your devs fixed an exploit. And you wonder why I continued trying to get you to understand that more exist.

Just take in what im saying and use it to your advantage. I'm telling you your script contains exploits, so go tell your devs to find them instead of trying to provoke me and argue with me. I'm giving you a genuine tip, take it.

For the 26th time, I have already done that, before you "pointed it out"... So JmZ, thanks for your assistance in pointing out that the script has exploits, but YOU DON'T KNOW the condition and security of the updated script and the test sites with the newest distro, so, until then, stop saying the same bull crap -- because that's what it is.

[CyberHacK]

+1 Little Dragon.

[JmZ]

We shall see upon release which you fixed then.

[Little Dragon]

We shall see upon release which you fixed then.

So you're saying, once the new release is out, you will download and disect it, and check if the exploits you found but never revealed, were fixed. Then, you're gonna come back here and post something like:

"Yeah, I checked your script, it still has exploits, I TOLD ya so, na na na naaa na"

Only goes to show your primary objective here. It's not to help out, that's for sure. I hope you do, so everyone can see what an ignorant, indignant human being you really are.

[Optimus Prime]

Don't bother with him Little Dragon. I think I've read your posts that the exploit was fixed like 30 times at least -- most people got that.

Didn't seem to matter to one person though, who's intent is clearly defamation (more or less).

If you have anything useful to say in this thread, which is about DDLCMS, do so. Be it a bug report, suggestion, whatever.

If you found an exploit then come here and say "there's an exploit, haha, but I'm not telling you where it is... you figure it out, bet you can't find it! haha sucker" ... LAME.

Tell me why would someone do that? Because it's a competing product?

That's just foolishness. My 2 cents.