User profile website field abuse

[nYXem]

Yes, we need not have a special field just to put in your favourite sites, sig can make up for it, but still, we should not be putting google.com as our site LOL. Trust me, its not our site

It doesnt really matter anyway, only registered users see site links and sigs.

I didn't get your point, mate.

nYXem Reviewed by nYXem on 11th Oct 2011. User profile website field abuse I have seen many users putting "google.com" and "besthostingforums.com" in their website field. Does it make any sense? I think this field should be used only for the sites you "own", not the sites you admire; there's a difference. In my opinion, a rule should be made for this. Also, we can have another field for "Favourite websites" where you can add links to whatever site you like. But putting links of sites you don't even "own" is meaningless, and in a way, its "abusing" the feature. Rating: 5

[Phresh]

Yes, we need not have a special field just to put in your favourite sites, sig can make up for it, but still, we should not be putting google.com as our site LOL. Trust me, its not our site



I didn't get your point, mate.

I think your still in the pre G+ Fblikes era...