DDLCMS question?

[DEViANCE]

Ahhhh i get it.... selfish.

Well you will get nowhere with that attitude.. whats the problem with loads of ddl sites, the better ones will be great and the others who don't add even more mods and uniqueness will FAiL.

Why should we start modding from such a simple base, when we casn start modding from a feature packed basae.. im speaking from my own webmaster point of view here.. this is what went through my mind... at this rate WCDDL is goona fail or end up like some strange cult following where only brainwashed people follow it hahahahahahah *giggles*

more sites = more sites to exchange with = more linkbacks = more traffic = more money =

DEViANCE Reviewed by DEViANCE on 25th Sep 2009. DDLCMS question? I saw before that DDLCMS was still very buggy doesn't anyone know if the bug list has shortened? Thanks! Rating: 5

[Dman]

Ahhhh i get it.... selfish.

Well you will get nowhere with that attitude.. whats the problem with loads of ddl sites, the better ones will be great and the others who don't add even more mods and uniqueness will FAiL.

Why should we start modding from such a simple base, when we casn start modding from a feature packed basae.. im speaking from my own webmaster point of view here.. this is what went through my mind... at this rate WCDDL is goona fail or end up like some strange cult following where only brainwashed people follow it hahahahahahah *giggles*

more sites = more sites to exchange with = more linkbacks = more traffic = more money =

You need to realise that not everyone has the same opinion. Also, guys for love of god, stop arguing. If you like DDLCMS, use DDLCMS, if you like WCDDL, use WCDDL. Solved.

[Bread]

topddl reloaded ftw!

But on a more serious note,

Ahhhh i get it.... selfish.

Well you will get nowhere with that attitude.. whats the problem with loads of ddl sites, the better ones will be great and the others who don't add even more mods and uniqueness will FAiL.

Why should we start modding from such a simple base, when we casn start modding from a feature packed basae.. im speaking from my own webmaster point of view here.. this is what went through my mind... at this rate WCDDL is goona fail or end up like some strange cult following where only brainwashed people follow it hahahahahahah *giggles*

more sites = more sites to exchange with = more linkbacks = more traffic = more money =

A script that comes blank, has 4000x more possibilities then a script that's preloaded with mods. Think of it as a spider web outline, the tree won't go as far with DDLCMS as it would with WCDDL, and the mere fact that your in the warez scene for money is shameful, if anything, you should be considered the selfish one. And I highly doubt WCDDL is gonna fail, I use it for some of my sites! And I will never switch to DDLCMS because it's too feature packed.

Overall, both scripts are solid, for both types of webmasters, ones that want to learn and experiment to become better in the future should use WCDDL, and ones that are strickly for profit and only want a site full of duplicate content then go for it, I mean, yea I feel that strickly making money is disgraceful to the warez scene, however some people are going to no matter what. But if you're looking to be super cool and have millions of super awesome friends use TOPDDL

-Bread

[DEViANCE]

topddl reloaded ftw!

But on a more serious note,




A script that comes blank, has 4000x more possibilities then a script that's preloaded with mods. Think of it as a spider web outline, the tree won't go as far with DDLCMS as it would with WCDDL, and the mere fact that your in the warez scene for money is shameful, if anything, you should be considered the selfish one. And I highly doubt WCDDL is gonna fail, I use it for some of my sites! And I will never switch to DDLCMS because it's too feature packed.

Overall, both scripts are solid, for both types of webmasters, ones that want to learn and experiment to become better in the future should use WCDDL, and ones that are strickly for profit and only want a site full of duplicate content then go for it, I mean, yea I feel that strickly making money is disgraceful to the warez scene, however some people are going to no matter what. But if you're looking to be super cool and have millions of super awesome friends use TOPDDL

-Bread

First i agree in part... BUT, I am not in the warez scene for money, though yes evilddl was built with money in mind but just look at my other site/s if you know them, they are all add free???

And sorry but there is more pontential imo for ddl cms, as i can code myself expanding on that is a far better and more easy option than expaning on wcddl, yes it may be more secure as there is so little to secure, simple as that.

You guys are obviously bashing it as you been in the ddl script scene a while and quite clearly fear the competition you now face.

And sorry but i have three hosting accounts, two that must be paid monthly and one yearly, about twenty domains, multiple other costs... most of my sites are ad free, i don't care what you think of evilddl, if your stupid enough to sign up for sharing zone i deserve your money. So there are three sponcered links and a few box images on index, sponcered search results at bottom, some ads on search results, are you forgetting the 11,000+ free links i am providing??? And as of yet have not made a single $, i am minus $2 right now lol...

On top of that i have a huge flat in centre of town, my living expences are around $400+ per week, i relly only on work i do online, i have no other job.. if you begrude me making cash i don't care you probably are 15 and live with your mom.

[JmZ]

And sorry but there is more pontential imo for ddl cms, as i can code myself expanding on that is a far better and more easy option than expaning on wcddl, yes it may be more secure as there is so little to secure, simple as that.

I'm sorry but I have to reply to this. I did want to stop replying to this thread but I can't let it go without clarifying things which you're assuming or stating.

First of all, the reason WCDDL was made was to give experienced webmasters a clean code base which they can then build on. So your reasoning stating that DDLCMS is better for expanding is really irrelevant. I'd say they're equally as useful for expanding, your opinion favours DDLCMS, not the facts.

Secondly, the reason WCDDL is secure is actually because when I code something, the primary objective I set is to make sure every single line is clean and not vulnerable. It's a habit, every script I code, I'll even escape integers for inserting into databases (which isn't needed obviously since it's an integer). That, is the reason why WCDDL is secure.

Put simply, WCDDL was coded for experienced webmasters, DDLCMS was coded for the general public (and to generate income for the creators). Two completely different audiences aimed at, so of course people from each audience are going to have conflicting opinions.

And so you know where im coming from when I say it was made for experienced webmasters, 90% of popular DDL sites are still based on KDDL purely because they want simplicity rather than complexity. Those are the people I aim at as WCDDL doesn't contain hardcoded visual elements so they can make it look how they want.

Anyway this isn't going anywhere, you're a DDLCMS-fanboy nobody can change your mind. Thread may aswell be locked or something.