Activity Stream
48,167 MEMBERS
6899 ONLINE
besthostingforums On YouTube Subscribe to our Newsletter besthostingforums On Twitter besthostingforums On Facebook besthostingforums On facebook groups

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 31
  1.     
    #11
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by DuckBre View Post
    um so whats the point of this topic?
    Disallow sell of cracked/patch Terminal Services on KWWH, aka unauthorized RDP connections since nulled WHMCS aren't allow. I see that some even offer "Registered" version of ZOOM. That can be considered as a "premium acc" service. I understand that premium accs aren't allow any longer, so why allowed "cracked" or "patched" ZOOM versions to be allowed? Why not let clients take responsible?

  2.   Sponsored Links

  3.     
    #12
    Member
    This site is using a hacked database of W junction
    Last edited by Gavo; 4th Jan 2015 at 02:03 PM.

  4.     
    #13
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by Gavo View Post
    What a dumb thread, Nulled WHMCS is known to have backdoors/exploits so unethical/stupid to use, if you cant afford a licence you shouldn't be selling hosting as its most likely you wont last more than 40 days.

    Raising Terminal services limit has no security implications so i don't see how it would be compared KWWH's WHMCS rule.


    I would think the OP has some cheap/free licences so wants to take out some smaller hosts here, why not share how to get wholesale licenced instead.
    So, are you saying if an expert webmaster take a nulled WHMCS and can secure it greatly, he should be allowed to use?

    I'm not sure about where the OP is really going with this but, I do feel disgusted of the idea where the admins just reinstall the OS just to run their server a bit longer and not caring the data of the users. I said this because if I'm a user of such host, I'll definitely leave.

    PS: I'm not sure LT, but if the DC or host provide Win licenses then, chances are they have MS agreement and each RDP connection should cost only $5.

    The RDP seller, should not find that hard to implement in the plan price. Such easy solution will prevent them from keep reinstalling the OS every 120 days, or patching the OS.

  5.     
    #14
    Member
    This site is using a hacked database of W junction
    Last edited by Gavo; 4th Jan 2015 at 01:59 PM.

  6.     
    #15
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by Gavo View Post
    What a dumb thread, Nulled WHMCS is known to have backdoors/exploits so unethical/stupid to use, if you cant afford a licence you shouldn't be selling hosting as its most likely you wont last more than 40 days.

    Raising Terminal services limit has no security implications so i don't see how it would be compared KWWH's WHMCS rule.


    I would think the OP has some cheap/free licences so wants to take out some smaller hosts here, why not share how to get wholesale licenced instead.
    But your last post suggests that idea. Really, that's the meaning I found.

  7.     
    #16
    Member
    Its always better to signup for MS SPLA ( Directly or Through Re seller).

  8.     
    #17
    Banned
    Website's:
    budgetvds.com hilohost.com wdispatch.com
    Gavo
    This was first brought up by VGNHeart it was never posted public though I just decided to post if for the public to read and understand what most RDP/RDA providers are doing when offering there services for sale on KWWHunction.

  9.     
    #18
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by LEVAC109 View Post
    Disallow sell of cracked/patch Terminal Services on KWWH, aka unauthorized RDP connections since nulled WHMCS aren't allow. I see that some even offer "Registered" version of ZOOM. That can be considered as a "premium acc" service. I understand that premium accs aren't allow any longer, so why allowed "cracked" or "patched" ZOOM versions to be allowed? Why not let clients take responsible?
    really? because i see no point in it, have you ever seen some user complaining about that his provider does use registered terminal licences? i mean really if you ask me this is a troll topic, but hey its fun to read im really enjoying it

  10.     
    #19
    Member
    Quote Originally Posted by DuckBre View Post
    really? because i see no point in it, have you ever seen some user complaining about that his provider does use registered terminal licences? i mean really if you ask me this is a troll topic, but hey its fun to read im really enjoying it
    They do. That's exactly why robert started this thread to explain the cause. If you didn't understand read the simple flow chart.


    Unregistered/Patched Terminal License > Unstable RDP Host > Disconnects of RDP Users

    You see, people wouldn't say "unregistered terminal licence" !!!! because they're not told of the cause. So they say what's the one the see directly. Without that main root cause, there's wouldn't be any complain about this.

    Think beyond the texts.

  11.     
    #20
    Member
    Website's:
    CarAudioChat.com BneHost.com Droid-Me.com
    Quote Originally Posted by robert420 View Post
    I noticed alot of users on this forum making reports about there accounts won't login or either they get a disconnection message when they try to login to there RDA account or RDP Account

    While let me tell y'all the truth most All The RDA providers on this forum whom are selling these RDA/RDP accounts what every they wanted called them are illegal patching up there Windows system in order to allow more then 2 connection has the default is set to only allow 2 concurrent RDP connection on Windows Systems. The only thing that provider tell you is the issue has been fixed nope it hasn't been fixed cause it will continue to happen until that terminal services is fully licensed so you'll continue to get disconnection message and the ability not to be able to login until that terminal service is patched again.

    Question Why are they doing this?
    A. To
    remove a limitation in Terminal Services default terminal services only allows the maximum of 2 users to connect at the sametime but when patched up it's allows more then one person to connect.

    If nulled WHMCS can't be used then all RDA/RDP providers should provide proof showing they've an actually licenses to allow more then one users to connect to there RDP/RDA server ?

    If they don't they'll make them running an illegal operating system cause it's against Microsoft Terms of Services.

    Question how much does it cost ?
    A. Check for yourself by searching Google.

    Price
    http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/...ctID.216653900
    Im sure there are some providers that are paying for there license. Not everyone tries to rip shit off.


    Get Your Android On And Win A Free VPS - http://droid-me.com

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Truth behind every Webhost!!!
    By XSLTel in forum Hosting Discussion
    Replies: 31
    Last Post: 24th Aug 2012, 08:44 PM
  2. BoxSlots - The TRUTH
    By nano. in forum Hosting Discussion
    Replies: 47
    Last Post: 4th Dec 2011, 10:05 PM
  3. Truth about DMCA
    By Wise in forum Webmaster Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 21st Feb 2011, 02:46 AM
  4. Truth About Santrex
    By Angeix in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10th Jun 2010, 07:01 PM
  5. The only truth
    By martin-007 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 17th Sep 2009, 02:55 PM

Tags for this Thread

BE SOCIAL